cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/6738148

The much maligned “Trusted Computing” idea requires that the party you are supposed to trust deserves to be trusted, and Google is DEFINITELY NOT worthy of being trusted, this is a naked power grab to destroy the open web for Google’s ad profits no matter the consequences, this would put heavy surveillance in Google’s hands, this would eliminate ad-blocking, this would break any and all accessibility features, this would obliterate any competing platform, this is very much opposed to what the web is.

  • @RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4311 months ago

    It’s like everything is named ironically these days. There is nothing “trusted” about a device whose sole purpose is secure things against the person who ostensibly owns it.

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    2611 months ago

    What’s that, Google? You say you want me to switch to DuckDuckGo and Firefox? And you’re insistent that I do it? Okay, sure.

    • @Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3511 months ago

      Yeah, DRM has always scared away all the users. That’s why nobody adopted DVDs, that “Netflix” company failed to create a video streaming service, Steam never became a dominant game distributor, etc.

      Most people won’t notice or care. Most companies’ customers will buy what’s advertized to them. It’s very dangerous to assume consumers want freedom, we need to fight for it, not ignore the threat due to naïve idealism.

        • @herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          I once worked at a software company where it took the frontend guys like a month to finally notice that common adblockers broke one of their sites (which didn’t actually have ads on it, funnily enough). None of them noticed because none of them used adblockers on any of their machines. When people like that don’t run adblockers, it’s not realistic at all to expect the average user to do it.

          • 8bitguy
            link
            fedilink
            611 months ago

            As a full stack guy that has done his fair share of front end work, I use an adblocker on the devices that I use in my personal realm. I don’t have them in my development area because most people don’t use them. I want what I test on to be as stock as possible. I’ve observed that most people go with what “comes out of the box.” That said, I get to look at my efforts on my personal devices. If something is off, I’ll see it. If I had to code to every popular extension, it would be hard to get anything done.

        • @Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Sadly most people don’t have an ad blocker installed. Per this site <50% use ad blockers. Most users are using mobile devices, and the majority of those don’t have any ad blockers available in their default browsers/webViews. They won’t notice.

      • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        People didn’t have access to non-drm versions of those for 20 years first though. If we started with drm web then I’d be less optimistic, but people are going to notice when their sites don’t work.

    • 001100 010010
      link
      fedilink
      911 months ago

      Except Google actually has the power to do that. Do you think Youtube content creators are going to use Peertube? No I don’t think so.

  • @monobot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    This will be great, just filter me out from all ad content. I will not even need ad blocker.

    • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Your doctor, tax office and other public services or your employer or job seeking webite says hi.

      Very few of us can truly live without the internet.