Judge Aileen Cannon said she would issue a ruling later after appearing skeptical of arguments from both sides

  • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Judge Cannon has absolutely no business being on this case and it’s a joke to our entire justice system that she can be anywhere near a court room involving the president that appointed her to the bench. She needs to be recused.

  • Col3814444@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Aileen “loose” Cannon knows where her bread is buttered.

    She need to be impeached for not recusing herself due to the OBVIOUS conflict of interest alone given that she was appointed by the man she is judging. Seriously what the living fuck?

    • charles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      She has a lifetime appointment, so from that perspective, she doesn’t owe them anything. Unless she’s got eyes on SCOTUS, which historically wouldn’t take people as wildly partisan as her, but times have obviously changed in SCOTUSland.

  • charles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    TL;DR Summary:

    Federal Judge Aileen Cannon, overseeing Donald Trump’s classified documents case, hinted that the trial might be delayed until 2024, deeming the matter potentially complex. This comes after prosecutors and Trump’s attorneys presented their arguments. While prosecutors had urged the judge not to defer the trial beyond the 2024 election, Trump’s side recommended a postponement. The case involves Trump being charged with retaining crucial national defense information. Given the nature of the charges, the case is governed by the Classified Information Procedures Act (Cipa), which has specific rules for cases involving classified documents, making it more time-consuming than standard criminal cases. Both Trump and his valet, Walt Nauta, have pleaded not guilty. If the trial is delayed post-2024 and Trump wins the election, he could possibly pardon himself or instruct the justice department to dismiss the case.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jack Smith needs to pound home the Speedy Trial Doctrine. It shouldn’t just apply to defendants, although that’s usually who it benefits.