2024 could be the year the PC finally dumps x86 for Arm, all thanks to Windows 12 and Qualcomm’s new chip::We’ve already reported on Qualcomm’s new 12-core Arm uberchip, the Snapdragon X Elite, and its claims of x86-beating performance and efficiency. But it takes two to tango when it comes a maj

  • the_q@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is Microsoft working on a compatibility layer like Apple did? If no then 2024 is just another x86_64 year filled with bullshit news and hype train conductors.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        It isn’t as good because Rosetta 2 exploits some custom features built into the their M processors. Specifically, there is a special mode that strengthens the memory model, which is critical for both performance and correctness when it comes to executing multithreaded x86 programs on ARM.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The CPU and processing power benefits would be great, but if I’m going to lose software support then I’m only going to do it for RISC V.

    • KeriKitty (They(/It))@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yaaaah, came here to something something RISC-V ^.^ One of these days I’ll have a RISC-V system. I’ll have no actual use for it but I’ll love it stubbornly just because :D

      Anyway I’m gonna be over here daydreaming about RISC-V taking over the world instead of ARM. Bwehehehehe.

      (Edited to fix my ^.^-face)

      • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fundamentally, I’m not sure Qualcomm is the brand I’d trust to lead the world off of x86.

        I understand nobody actually likes Qualcomm products in the cellular space, but they’re stuck with them due to patent minefields. That’s not really a great vibe to bring in when trying to compete against known-quantity x86 vendors.

        I figured we’d see homogenous CPUs-- either in the same socket or as an addon module, so you can cast off some stuff to ARM or RISC-V but keep big x86 for games and heavy closed-source software, then flip to RISC-V main with x86 addon cards, and finally emulation.

        Sort of thinking about a Pinetab-V, but even the flaky, doesn’t suspend right 20% of the time, wigi was weird on every OS except OpenBSD, Ryzen 2700U it would replace demolishes it. The Lichee Console looked neat with the EEE PC sizing and Trackpoint, but it’s way pricier.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Where would those benefits be? Let’s start with gaming on the M3 Mac - it’s CPU bound in many games even though apple’s compatibility later is actually good. And the GPU is a joke, even compared to the Intel dGPU offerings. Let’s not start on encoding (besides iMovie), packing or compiling things. Or even actually rendering stuff…

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Compatibility layers are comprehensive, but they’re generally not performant. For me personally, I use a real computer that runs my daily workload, servers and games all at once on different virtual desktops, so a faster CPU will definitely be impactful.

        It’s not just about avoiding 100% CPU either. CPUs not being the bottleneck for performance sounds like a great problem to have

  • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    They’re going to have to get the emulation working better for x86/x64 software. And they’re going to have to get the driver situation sorted – which likely means requiring ARM drivers alongside x86/x64 drivers in order to meet certification for having a Windows sticker or WHQL certification to gradually build up the list of supported hardware.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know what the author was smoking, but nobody that knows what x86 and ARM are would reasonably say x86 is anywhere near its end. I want it to be, fuck I want it to be, but I’m also not stupid enough to think it’s happening even remotely soon.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ampère makes some ARM CPUs that go with modular boards, where you can socket your own CPU, DDR5 RAM, NVMe drives and PCIe accessories.

    • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      yeah, least thing I would want is my PC becoming another use and throw mobile phone(it’s already happening with mac and hp’s elitebook).

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Nope, I’ll never run windows on anything other than x86 (for my desktop).

    I’m very happy with my ARM MBP for work, but I occasionally pull up software written decades ago (either music production plugins or games typically) on windows and it still runs, some of the companies that wrote that software no longer exist, so no first party patches will be coming.

  • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    For all the informed technical analysis and debates about this, the vast majority of consumers don’t care about any of this stuff, and they’re the ones who will decide this “year of the whatever.” The worse option technically speaking has won out many times in the past.

  • Crafter72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Tell me you never used Arm based system for daily drive without telling me you never used Arm based system. General software compatibility is not there and PC is not only on Windows or Mac. Sure on Mac they have enterprise support for their user. By having more power (bruteforcing) to run the emulation simply does not mean the software run flawless.

    Maybe I’m a bit bias since I’m comparing it with SBCs (but thats what is affordable). As someone who have Raspberry Pi 4 and Orange Pi 5, the situation is a bit different. Raspberry Pi have a well supported system by communities and the devs, meanwhile on Orange Pi 5 some drivers are not released by the Orange Pi/left to the dust if there are no maintainer, not to mention if you want specific build of binary which not covered by repo/ppa, you have to build yourself from source, and the GPU driver situation for OPi5 which not yet have Vulkan support and sub par performance on Linux meanwhile on RPi5 they have Vulkan support 2 weeks after release.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    All the top posts here are people saying it won’t happen.

    I was at the store over the weekend and saw a full display of chromebooks. Someone purchased one right in front of me.

    I’m sure there’s a market for both technologies to exist at the same time.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      They’re purchasing the OS, not the CPU/SOC architecture.

      Microsoft doesn’t have the same loyalty that Apple does. They can’t afford to release an ARM OS that isn’t already supported by all major software applications, and majority support for normal x86 apps, with assistance and roadmap to completely bridge the gap.

      When the transition is seamless, or 90% seamless, the architecture won’t matter, and customers won’t even realize they’ve switched.

      If they release ARM hardware that doubles battery life and performance, but doesn’t offer a seamless transition, it’ll flop. Just like their last attempt did.

      • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Microsoft doesn’t have loyalty? They have practical market dominance. I say this as a Linux user but ain’t no way Microsoft can do anything to drive away their user base. If their users buy a laptop and find half their software doesn’t run on it or runs sh*ttily due to emulation, I’m pretty sure they’ll blame the laptop manufacturers before Microsoft or demand the laptops have a x86 variant and even that’s a long way before moving to another os.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Exactly.

        This quote reveals the lack of understanding about how MS works:

        Thus far, there’s little doubt that Microsoft’s efforts with Windows on Arm have been half hearted.

        Half-hearted? I bet MS research developed a plan for ARM before the public knew ARM existed. They have a massive research department.

        They don’t need to support ARM until it’s well-established at a performance point that can supplant x86 even under emulation. Their major clients are business, and frankly laptop battery life is more than good enough for business users today (I can run almost all day on battery, and I do a lot of file management with a 3 year old, midrange business laptop).

        Now what’s compelling for big business is power consumption in data centers or even office buildings. But those systems aren’t running Windows directly on iron - it’s all virtualized. So even there I’m not sure ARM competes yet. Maybe for desktops in the office, call centers, etc. But those already use Mini PCs.

        Gonna be interesting to see how it all works out. Will we really see dramatically better battery life on a Windows ARM laptop? Will this also be the return of Windows Phone/Tablet (does this change the tablet definition if it can run Windows/Linux?)

        Edit: Forgot that MS already has Win10 IoT Enterprise, and Win10 IoT Core - so Enterprise for managing IoT devices, and Core to run on IoT devices. Core is much like Embedded Windows in that it’s stripped down and only runs one app. I’m sure MS considered ARM devices when building it, and wouldn’t be surprised they’ve already done extensive testing with an ARM version already.

      • YerbaYerba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I bought a $300 amd Chromebook and run Linux on it. Had to flash a new efi firmware to make it fully usable though. Worst part of it is the soldered 8gb of RAM but it works for my usage.

  • pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s a lot of focus on Windows for these types of chips, but Chromebooks are probably the best use case for them right now. ChromeOS runs great on ARM and there’s no legacy software to worry about, but they feel kind of slow because the ARM chips they’ve used have been slow. I’d love an ARM Chromebook that actually rips.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’ve used an ARM Mac for the past 3 years on both macOS and Linux. My trusty M1 Air has been an absolute joy to use. I would like more options for a fast, battery efficient and most importantly fanless laptop, so I’m looking forward to this.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Limping along with a wonky hinge on my 5 year old laptop waiting for these to come out. Haven’t run windows for years now so I don’t think I’ll be missing intel much at all. Might have to do some cross compiling for deploying software to intel cloud nodes, but arm VMs for android development will speedy.

    • Toes♀@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Depending on which problem you’re experiencing, I’ve used jb weld to fix it.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        JB Weld is magic (as is it’s competitor PC7, seems to be the same stuff). I just used it to fix an iPad keyboard - the part holding the iPad cracked near the hinge. Just filled the interior with JB and reassembled (it squeezed some JB out). Crack is still there, but the hinge area is even more rigid now. Of course it’ll never come apart again.

        I’d like to promote Goop. It’s like a super thick rubber cement. There’s very little it won’t stick to. Very strong. It’s pretty much all I use anymore. Oh, and it peels right off when you need to remove it (though it takes some effort).

        I’ve glued phone mounts to the dash with it. Power strips to the underside of the desk. Glued laptops back together when the screw mounts break. Use it for the metal disks on back of phones for magnetic mounts. It’s holding L-brackets to the back of the TV so I could put the soundbar on top. Also a bunch of industrial Velcro (the thick plastic stuff) on the back of the TV to hold a wifi router, Bluetooth adapter, USB hub, power supplies, and cable management.

        • Toes♀@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Oh I’ll have to look for that. It took a week for your message to appear for me. Not sure why