• OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can build as many houses as you want but until you restrict investment firms and landlords buying all of them you won’t put a dent in the problem.

  • Grappling7155@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s exciting to see that the government could cut up to a year of development time with these blueprints. I’m curious what they’ll come up with that reflects the best of what modern BIM, digital twin, offsite manufacturing, CLT, and modular construction technologies can do.

    Hopefully there will be a variety of to choose from for different kinds of environments and tastes. Personally I’d like to see some 6 storey apartments complexes, designed to accommodate car free lifestyles.

    • Grappling7155@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is still only one piece of the puzzle though. To restore affordability it would make sense to prioritize building and converting more existing stock to non-market housing so there’s competitive pressure on the remaining/existing landlords to keep rent low.

      Vienna has done a wonderful job to show the world what’s possible after a century of continuous improvements with non market housing.

    • LostWon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Me too. I was under the impression, though, that a minimum amount of space for parking is a requirement of all residentially zoned land, regardless of intended use. Zoning laws might need changing if I’m remembering that right.

  • SideshowBoz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Truly feels like a “we’ve tried nothing, and we’re out of ideas!” situation, it’s almost comical.

    It seems like these are blueprints for single family homes, so we’ll be stuck with car-based city designs that aren’t helping us solve the housing crisis in the first place…

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Seems like a pretty good plan, hope the new designs are energy efficient!

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    So are the demographics (on a statistical level) finally in favor of this?

    Edit: I don’t get how they ever weren’t? Actual house/property deed holders are a minority of the population, can someone please dispute this (without citing the bullshit hatchet-job StatsCanada bs that a majority of Canadians are property owners regardless of their mortgage/deed-holding status --> kids who are getting kicked out at 18 are hOmEoWnErS o_O 🙄)

  • Radicalized@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not a supply issue — there’s enough empty homes in Canada right now to house every single person in this country.