• Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      141
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s pretty telling a platform like YouTube really only gets fully enjoyable with an adblocker, sponsorblock and this. I wish PeerTube had a lot of good creators, but last time I checked (years ago, admittedly) it was mostly conspiracy theorists and cryptobros.

      • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with PeerTube is that there’s no built-in way for creators to get paid. If there are no ads or sponsors, then the only alternative is some kind of value for value system like what Podcasting 2.0 has. Until some kind of well integrated funding system gets built for PeerTube, creators really are not going to be incentivized to publish stuff on the platform.

        • lohrun@fediverse.boo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          At this point I’m down with paying a monthly subscription to a creator for content. I’ve never signed up for any creator’s pattern or anything because how the system is currently set up. I know some creators switched to posting less frequently because their more frequent posting appeared to be hurting their view count due to YouTube’s algorithm. I am so willing to pay a creator directly for them to go back to making more frequent content (and content they actually enjoy and not stuff just for views)

          • lackthought@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            my only issue with this is eventually people will hit a financial limit and only be able to support a few creators, leaving others without funding

            I’m following over 30 youtube channels, even at $1/month per channel that would still be $30/month which is too much for me honestly. not to mention the fact I would have to manage 30 different subscriptions

            I’d like a youtube premium style subscription where I can specify a group of channels and the money gets distributed to them only

            this way my money isn’t going to conspiracy channels, and I would only have a single subscription to manage

            • lohrun@fediverse.boo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Does nebula have enough content to be worth it now? I haven’t heard anyone with a sponsor spot for nebula in a few years now

              • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know how much content would be “worth it” to most people. I just subscribed for Lindsay Ellis coming back, since she’s no longer uploading to YouTube due to the “git her b****, it’s her time” cancelling bullshit.

          • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you are willing to pay… then why not yt premium ? A cut goes to google, sure, but it goes to creators, based on your watch time, without falling into having to support 1-infinite channels etc. Plus no ads without any tricks

            • lohrun@fediverse.boo
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I already pay for YouTube premium but that doesn’t change how creators make content. The YouTube algorithm and its mystery has really changed how people make content over the years. There have been people I’ve watched for 10+ years now and it’s sucks to see them have to chase the algorithm to maintain their livelihood. If I could pay a creator directly to get more content, I gladly would

        • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Best I can think of, would be implementing Librepay into PeerTube and make payments easy af.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ooh! Thanks for the tip! Dumb question, Peertube federates, right? Where you can get a feed of all subscribed channels from lots of instances on one instance? With a quick poke around I’m not seeing username@instancsname so I’m slightly thrown off, but I’ve also only been on the fediverse for like a month

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            PeerTube is also part of ActiviyPub, so yes it federates.

            I know tilvids.com doesn’t federate directly with anyone, but you can subscribe to any channel on tilvids.com from any other PeerTube instance.

      • SSTF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t forget the PocketTube extension, which allows you to sort subscriptions into self-made categories. Which is shockingly not a default feature.

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean yes but also it’s not that hard. Google is not trying to give you a great experience, they’re trying to drive clicks to ads.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used it for exactly three minutes and this is already amazing. I hope it gets integrated into ReVanced and Newpipe.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Kind of. It’s a desktop web front-end to Youtube. I’m not sure whether it blocks in-stream ads (and I’m not turning off Ublock to find out), but it does basically reimplement the Youtube interface without many of its undesired elements.

            • rtxn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If you feel so strongly about the matter, feel free to not use it. Or better yet, contribute to the project to bring it up to feature parity.

              As for the link - I guess whatever parses the URLs on Lemmy doesn’t recognise .video as a valid top-level domain. All I wrote was piped.video, everything else was added by the website.

            • 🇦🇺Baku@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, you’re not necessarily wrong, but for some people that is kind of just the appeal. It’s very obviously targetted at a very niche group of people, and if you’re not in that, of course you’ll dislike it

        • Krompus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          More like Newpipe but it actually works (GURU MEDIATION) and has nice UI. I just found it yesterday on FDroid, I recommend it.

    • Kyogen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks, I didn’t know revanced was a thing. I only enjoyed old vanced for briefly in its last days. So good to hear theres still options like this around.

        • Supernovae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly ReVanced is quite a bit more extensible than Vanced and works very reliably. Plus it’s open source and you can download it off GitHub. The manager makes downloading patches about as easy as installing Vanced with the manager a few years ago. I’m sure someone will add a derrow patch to Revanced very soon

          • hypnotoad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve used vanced and revanced since day one and always checked the stickied reddit post for any update notes before upgrading to the latest patch set. Revanced decided to migrate to Discord which is possibly the dumbest place they could have gone to (read: I don’t know how to use it to quickly find relevant patch notes and am angry about it), and I feel like updating to a new version is a crapshoot.

            Do you know of a better place to find out which versions are compatible with the latest APK and where to get support if something breaks?

            • Supernovae@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The Manager does a reasonable job identifying patches available for a given version. The Issues page on GitHub has a lot of the bugs laid out. The Releases tab also has the update notes and the website has the patch notes (including required version).

              On the Discord, #announcements has the major update info. #support acts quite a lot like the old Reddit page where people post issues they’ve run into with threaded replies. I agree having a ReVanced Lemmy page would be better than Discord but Discord Posts are shockingly usable imo. Chat and Off-Topic are obviously horrifically unsearchable chatrooms but also aren’t the only resources on the server.

  • Acid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really good extension, I’ve added it to my browser.

    While some creators like Linus have said they dislike the clickbaity titles and thumbnails but they have to do it due to engagement that’s simply because the younger generations are the ones engaging with that content. As an older person I’d rather just have a to the point description of what I’m going to get.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might get it for the titles alone. The clickbaity thumbnails don’t really bother me, but I’d like to have a good title at least.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it can be said to conclusively be an age issue. I assure you that many Boomers and older Xers love clickbait titles.

      It’s a more granular demographic than just age.

      • Acid@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe but I can only go with my own anecdotal experience and It tends to be the younger audience more attracted to them.

        Of course, I fully admit I may be completely wrong.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a reason clickbait images and titles are used, they work. If they didn’t work, no one would use them.

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        You must think marketing is made of infallible geniuses. Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.

        • scytale@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          They didn’t say it was good, just that it’s what works; that’s why it’s everywhere.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody said “good”, but if it keeps existing, it works or at least isn’t harmful. Bit like evolution.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or there are people with an interest in keeping it that way.

            I don’t think there’s any big conspiracy about YouTube titles, but let’s not pretend thing like wealth inequality still exist because they’re not harmful.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?

              Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.

              • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you serious? You literally answered your own question with the very next sentence.

                • Lumidaub@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget that creators will release a video that you might want to watch later and then change the information.

      You’ll see a video you want to check tomorrow but not enough to add it to the “watch later”. But when you check your subscriptions the next day it’s been 12+ hours and they’ve changed the title and thumbnail to further game the algorithm.

  • restarossa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    But I don’t want to reward people that do this by watching their videos

      • Nomadic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        KIDS. accept it, that’s all who has all this time to watch these dumbed down videos , and what are they attracted to? Apparently gaping mouths.

        • Lukeson@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          heard its on chromium based browsers. just hope it does not come to Firefox.

          • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So what you’re saying is that YouTube will become incompatible with firefox?

            • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not hard to disguise the browser you’re using. I use Mullvad (Firefox fork) and it will show up as Chrome on the host side.

          • littlecolt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            For a while, it was getting blocked regularly and a new update would come out that fixed it. Repeat.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Let’s be honest, they never took it seriously at all.

              They could push a patch for encrypted streams to chrome and even firefox, basically you need a google account to watch videos, wouldn’t be optimal but they could get away with it.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hulu with ads displays no ads when watching in a browser with uBlock origin. I don’t know if this is down to lazy design by Hulu or not but it’s another data point

      • dtxer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sadly I can’t find Sponsorblock and BlockTube in the Firefox addon store (Android).

          • Nomadic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            For this ridiculousness alone I quit Firefox. They absolutely do not care about their users. They also have been pushing a lot of shady things, like running experiments and tracking by default. And ff for Android still doesn’t have printing, 5 years after requesting to add it BACK

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Removing clickbait channels, foreign language channels, livestreams, channels I dislike, and whatever Youtube keeps recommending me over and over no matter how many times I hit “not interested”

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Removing clickbait channels, foreign language channels, livestreams, channels I dislike, and whatever Youtube keeps recommending me over and over no matter how many times I hit “not interested”

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love the idea, but just to be the devil’s advocate, I think it will just mask garbage videos. Currently, the clickbait thumbnails and titles are an indicator to blacklist a channel, without having to waste time watching it.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately because of the way Youtube’s algorithm works, even high quality channels are buried if they don’t play the game.

    • ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you look at the DeArrow website and browser extension pages, I made sure to only use high quality channels as examples (Tom Scott, CGP Grey) to demonstrate how far reaching the sensationalism problem is.

      • StandingPad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Tom Scott’s thumbnails aren’t that bad IMO, they’re pretty minimal in comparison to some other channels.

        • ajay@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But they are so much worse than they were 6 months ago. He’s gone and ruined all of the old ones too with arrows and more deceptive titles.

      • LichbaneLB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        CGP Grey is personally painful to me. He used to be a no-nonsense education youtube legend, but in the last few years he’s just maximised clickability - even going thorugh his whole back catalogue and changing titles and thumbnails.

        For example, he made a great video about generative adversarial networks ~5 years ago but now its titled “How machines like ChatGPT learn” - despite coming out before GPT.

        • dack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much every successful YouTube channel edits titles. It’s just part of the algorithm game now. You will often see videos cycle through several different titles shortly after release.

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This add-on needs to:

    • Store unlimited amount of client-side data
    • Access your data for sites in the googlevideo.com domain
    • Access your data for sites in the youtube.com domain
    • Access your data for sponsor.ajay.app
    • Access your data for dearrow-thumb.ajay.app
    • Access your data for www.youtube-nocookie.com

    This add-on may also ask to: **Access your data for all websites

    Is there a better option than for it to need unlimited amount of client-side data? Also, why “Access your data for all websites”?-

    • ajay@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Creator of theq extension here, that is an optional permissions (may ask). It never asks to access to all sites, it only optionally let’s you add support for additional sites such as different Invidious instances. These are arbitrary domains, so it needs permission to ask for any arbitrary website.

      Support for invidious is not actually done yet, so right now, it never asks for permission for any new sites anyway

      The client side data is used to store your submissions to always show your preferred title, even if there is another submission on the server. You can disable this option in the settings

    • whereisk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Without having investigated the plug in itself, going by just what you posted: That’s not likely to be a nefarious request, the plug-in needs to store data on your computer. Dealing with large number of titles it makes sense that it would cache things on your computer to minimise overtaxing their servers, to serve you more or less the same data over and over.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google’s algorithm has forced people into using click bait thumbnails and titles. If they don’t attract more views and subscribers, then their channels are not pushed.

    • 80085@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a bigger problem is they demonetize and depromote any video discussing a controversial or kid-unfriendly topic. This affects the actual content.

      Also, don’t forget to subscribe, hit that like button, smash that bell, and leave a comment letting me know what you think!

    • FlagonOfMe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you implying that content creators don’t themselves want more views and subscribers? Of course they do!

      “They only use thumbnails and titles that get views and subscribers because if they don’t… they won’t get views and subscribers since Google isn’t pushing their content.”

      That’s what it sounds like you’re saying.

      • aaron_griffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the point is that you can’t get more views by being genuine and honest, as the algorithm awards griftiness

          • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, you just aren’t going to get as many views if you don’t. Veritasium has a video on it, regarding his rubber balls video.

            • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Linus also mentioned it, he said he hates doing it but the clickbait videos significantly outperform others.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never said otherwise, but it is possible to be successful without the clickbait. There are a few creators that have managed it. They would just make more money if they went with clickbait.

      • Chreutz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is that channel growth, clicks and interactions as a metric is used more for suggesting videos than relevancy and the likelihood that someone will watch a video to the end.

        This creates a click bait arms race between creators.

      • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s real easy to solve this problem by just not pushing videos with text, arrows, symbols or reaction soyfaces in thumbnails. The issue is that they push all of that to the top and push everything else to the bottom.

    • ramplay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only way to win the game, is to not play in the first place unfortunately

  • verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I kind of like seeing the clickbait, it lets me know which videos/channels arent worth my time. I know most use at least a little clickbait these days, but from the better channels its usually managable and still on topic (like the Real Engineering example shown here, whereas the others are complete clickbait that I would avoid).

  • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never thought it could be possible to do that, thank you so much for this and making YouTube a better place.

    If someone knows how to get rid of shorts in the search results I’d be most grateful 👌

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t mind the clickbait as much because I’ve learned to filter the crap out to some degree (following F1 channels does that to a mf), but still, anything to keep the bullshit to a minimum.

    This should be a part of newpipe.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The majority of videos I that pop up on my home feed don’t have clickbait thumbnails. A few admittedly do, but they are usually way toned down and when mixed among other videos in my feed not as vacuous when it’s just a few of them.

      I think the issue can be largely self correcting on the user side if people just take a little bit of effort to curate good content for themselves.

      • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately, terrible thumbnails and titles are just a part of the culture in some circles, even if the channels themselves make good content. Look at this trash, and these are actually the better ones:

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Clickbait works

          LTT has repeatedly done less clickbaity titles/thumbnails and their views are noticeably lower. The YT algorithm pushes clickbait a lot more than non-clickbait.

          • Kilamaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not really yt algorithm that pushes it. People click more on clickbait (duh) so yt sees more engagement so it shoes it more. Blame people, not youtube imo

            • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a combination of both. Google pushes people into watching random shit rather than a curated feed of their subscriptions. It didn’t used to be this way. YT used to reward subscribers heavily but now creators are dependent on the algo for ~50% of their traffic.