• iBaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      139
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      7 months ago

      What can he do about it? We live in a free market society. All he can do is keep talking about it and hope the people get the message. Rebellion will start at the consumer level and go up, not the other way around. Main problem is the millions of people that rely on Fox for their news.

      • WeeSheep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        156
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Use the anti monopoly laws we have in place to prevent price gouging from lack of competition

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            48
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sorry to be pedantic on the internet (lol) but it might be more accurate to say inflation has slowed.

              • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Except the unfortunate part is that it is always increasing, it’s just a derivative, rate of change. But the massive boost from months of heavy inflation is now here permanently, so we’re adding 2-3% on TOP of the already-inflated costs. But that’s not telling the full story, it is the value of the US dollar going down primarily. Buying power is lower by definition, but because of that, everyone on the bottom end is getting squeezed beyond anything they are ready for and it’s going to eventually cause civil unrest on a larger scale.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              He picked two points in time and described a number that was fixed at each instance, so decreased works fine.

            • protist@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Burn the pedant!

              I still think decreased is accurate though, the rate of inflation is significantly smaller today vs then, so the rate has decreased

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yeah if it was deflation that would’ve been a huge deal because our economy is built on an inflationary assumption and deflation would crash it

      • Deiv@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        Damn there is nothing the government can do. Sorry guys :( You’ll just have to buy less food, and maybe then the corporations will get the hint!

        Regulations? Laws against price gauging? Naw, they can’t do that. It’s the consumers that are at fault!

        • iBaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do you think Biden makes the laws? Did you fail civics class? I said nothing about enacting laws making what these companies are doing illegal, I only said Biden can’t do much about it.

          • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            He can propose laws to the legislative bramch. He might not be able to pass it himself but he could push and advocate for it

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m sure the GOP-led house would be very receptive to that

              • conductor@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Oh what does it hurt then?

                Can’t say anything, because of the GOP.

                Super cool having a democrat president who’s got no balls. Can’t offend the house.

      • graymess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        Price controls are well within the president’s powers. It’s not that radical of a concept.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s within congress’s powers for sure. I don’t think the president. Congress has done it in the past though, so they for sure can again.

        • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why is this upvoted?

          No, the president of the United States cannot unilaterally implement price controls on goods without the involvement of Congress. Price controls typically involve changes to laws and regulations, which fall under the legislative branch’s authority. Congress would need to pass legislation granting such powers or specifically authorizing the president to implement price controls in certain circumstances.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Price controls are an extremely radical concept, themselves. Last thing this economy needs is further distortion.

          The sucky thing about inflation is you have to run through it like an illness.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Windfall taxes. Let them share their gains, that’s the whole point of taxes since society don’t work otherwise.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s vastly different from a direct price control, in both intent and effect.

              I’d love to pass lots more taxes but with the current House that’s completely impossible

    • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      that was basically it. short of siccing the irs on them there’s not a lot the executive branch can do about it… of course that’d kill the golden goose named “campaign contributions”, so it wont happen

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      It will be harder to pass new laws in the current Congress, but he still has control over the executive branch. Hopefully some existing laws could be used.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He appointed the most aggressive FTC head in decades who is using the antitrust law we have to currently go after Google and Amazon.

        She’s also fighting a merger between Kroger and Albertsons, which would drastically raise grocery prices.

        The FTC is also fighting the hedge fund buyout of preciously independent healthcare clinics, which has massively ramped up medical costs.

        Not to mention breaking the real estate agent fee monopoly.

        His executive branch has been busy as hell trying to help people.

        • Locuralacura@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Don’t tell us facts. We’ve already decided to believe whatever the fuck we want regardless. /s

    • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      I mean, you wouldn’t want the politicians to lose their legal bribes generous donations over acting in our interests instead of the corporations, would you?

      Will someone please think of the rich folks pockets?

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here??? Or am I missing some other reason for the downvotes?

        FWIW, I thought your comment was great. Gave me quite a chuckle! :-D

        • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Because this is just more of that “enlightened centrist both sides baaaaaaad” bullshit that dumbasses invoke whenever they want to diminish the power of one side, thus actually strengthening the other side, while claiming that they don’t care about sides at all, even though they just can’t stop themselves from only sputtering it out when it’s the dems doing something.

          And after trump if you still believe both sides are the same then you are certifiably brain dead.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          How is it possible that people don’t understand the implied “/s” here???

          They understand it and are angry because they’re being called out.

        • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s because I said bad things about Biden, even though I was talking about politicians as a whole. But you can’t say bad things about Biden or be any kind of critical about the current administration without getting trashed on here.

          • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean it was because you’re wrong and your comment was stupid, but enjoy your victimization, I guess!

      • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh and passed an executive order, along with having his justice department pursue more antitrust cases than any other administration.

    • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      All he can do is back out his limp-dick economic policies that are destroying the country and creating this problem…but there’s no chance of that.

      This damage is literally the point of the policies. What people don’t understand is that he’s doing this on purpose.