• HorseShedShingle@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      M3 is decently better then M2 and M3 Max is decently better then M2 Max.

      M3 Pro is the problem chip. It is barely better then M2 Pro, and as a few disadvantages compared to M2 Pro (less memory bandwidth, less CPU performance cores, etc.)

  • memerfrancisco@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you’re telling me that a base model M3 MacBook Air is roughly the same as an M1 Max? So apart from ram, SSD speed, and storage, Apple’s weakest laptop has roughly the same power as Apple’s most powerful laptop from like a year and a half ago?

    • FitzwilliamTDarcy@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes except (presumably) not in GPU performance. For those for whom that matters, the Max, even the M1 Max, should still way outperform a base M3.

  • ThatGuyFromBRITAIN@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How does this compare against the 2019 i9 MacBook Pro’s? Not sure whether it’s a good upgrade or not. Was really hoping they’d give the options of the Pro or Max chips.

  • nickpegu@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My question is how base M3 will stack up against M1 Pro on base Macbook Pro 14, especially on GPU side of things. Someone pretty please test this out please.

  • MadHatterNZ@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m unsure if moving from an M1 Pro (10core/16 gpu) to the M3 Pro (12 core/18 gpu) would be much of a performance jump?

    My main reason for the move would be to get 32GB min ram, as I keep hitting my 16gb limit.

  • RealFuryous@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t find specific geekbench results since their website won’t load on mobile. Closest results that compare to my 13" MacBook pro are 555 for single-core performance and 1,092 in the multi-core test.

    • likamuka@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 4GHz barrier was at last broken! I do remember the G6 from IBM that was about to bring the PowerMac beyond 6GHz.