• MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    So let me get this straight. Companies were like “instead of paying one senior dev 300k and 5 junior devs 150k, we can get rid of all the junior devs and give the senior dev AI to do all of the legwork thus saving us 750k.”

    And then they found out that AI costs money. So instead of ponying up the 100k in tokens for the senior dev to to their job, they are saying “Hey senior dev, we are taking away your bonus and replacing it with tokens! You can take it or be out of a job, because we refuse to keep anybody on board who doesn’t use AI to replace 5 junior devs”

    So these cheap fucks saved 750k, and are upset with the fact that they might only save 650k?

    While also destroying the planet to generate shitty code.

    I fucking hate this time line.

  • PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Now, some tech job candidates have begun asking about what AI compute budget they will have access to if they decide to join. “I am increasingly asked during candidate interviews how much dedicated inference compute they will have to build with Codex,” Thibault Sottiaux, engineering lead at OpenAI’s Codex, the startup’s AI coding service, wrote on X recently.

    Big fucking bullshit. No one ever ask for “AI compute budget”, people wants money. Not your coffee, not your foosball game, money.

    Guess what you can buy with money? Yeah, that compute time, if desired.

    What a fucking load of bullshit.

    • evol@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      They are talking about like internal quotas I believe? Like my friends company is limited to 1000 in spend per month while I have no cap and will blow through 2k in a week if I’m working long hours.

  • entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    Corporate owned media promoting a story about making you rely on tokens to outwork your coworkers so you don’t lose your job is the dumbest shit I’ve ever read.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    Gee guys… Did you maybe build a whole bunch of compute capacity for a product no one actually wants, and now you have to find a way to use it for something?

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe instead of food we can be paid in ozempic (to reduce appetite) and a very very tiny amount of food. all humanity would become very skinny, and then theres less health care costs due to obesity.

    I should really be in charge here.

    • Tharkys@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      So that is why people think Grey aliens are just future humans! They took too much Ozempic and now they need to harvest genes from us to fix their own DNA.

  • ChadGPT2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I remember when silicon valley used to build products that would help people improve their lives.

    The reaper or capitalist enshittification comes for all industries eventually.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    The chief marketing officer for AI, Bill Ofgoods, thinks this is a great idea and the CFO, Peg Inapoke, agrees. Brooklyn Bridge was unavailable for comment

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    With Levels.fyi pegging the 75th percentile software engineer salary at $375,000, Tunguz estimates that adding $100,000 in annual inference costs brings the fully loaded cost to $475,000 — meaning just over 20% of the compensation cost could come from AI usage in the future.

    and later

    Tunguz has been building AI tools and models into his daily workflow and is automating 31 tasks a day at a cost of about $12,000 a year in inference.

    This article is insane and proves me more that AI is product for rich people. Most of developers won’t see $100k per year paycheck in their lifetime.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      This article is insane and proves me more that AI is product for rich people. Most of developers won’t see $100k per year paycheck in their lifetime.

      These days an annual salary of $100k is at the very low end for most IT jobs in the USA (beyond the junior level). Even in my MCOL area $125k-$200k is more common.

  • bebabalula@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Company that sells random collections of words: People are increasingly asking for random collections of words instead of money!

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is a bit like a job listing for a trade or technician position advertising they will supply a vehicle.

    No shit, I need a van to do my job. You don’t really have a choice.

    • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Certainly not. This one seems to be the source article. And you know the problem with those archive paywall busting side. They are doing a DDOS on other sites and are serving malware. So I won’t link them. The article in question doesn’t have a paywall for me, so maybe clean your cookies and cache or install some paywall busting plugins. Some paywalls are also time based, so they start after a certain amount of days, after a certain amount of visits, and are therefore hard to predict. So no there’s no way to link another article.