• Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m starting to feel ever more smug and comfy since I started converting my gut feeling about AI in the beginning, into an opinion based on myriad articles and discussion about how immoral, environmentally insane, and error-prone/dangerous it is when used in the wrong way.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m beginning to understand why they’re having so many problems with Windows 11.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    The image was licensed under creative Commons where they just need to give attributions .

    The author even offered the download of the original keynote file, if someone wanted to edit the text or change something

    But no, they had to crunch it with copilot with some prompt “make it enough different so that we don’t need to give attribution”

  • Albbi@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    pls help. My bug fix branches keep getting continvoucly morged, and Tim is running backwards.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why aren’t Ai companies required to show their training data and include the licenses with each piece?

  • silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    We recently had a big day where we all gather at the organization I work at with presentations. I saw some AI graphics which is fine imo, but I also saw full COMPLETELY GENERATED slides. Nice background images, fine looking diagrams but with alien and fake text that got worse the more you stared 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮. It felt embarrassing and unprofessional.

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Around the turn of the decade there was this big movement to rename the master branch to main. GitHub, too, made that switch and when you create a new repository the master branch is called main. The original flowchart was from 2010, when the main branch was still called master, so it’s called master there.

    The AI generated flowchart, of course, is not a plagiarism machine and it’s exactly like a human being that is merely inspired by the source material. Surely it used the up-to-date name for that branch?

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Even the diagram this was based upon plagiarized from is too complicated for most projects to be using.