merdaverse@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 25 days agoWSJ is catching upimagemessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up1566arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1566arrow-down1imageWSJ is catching upmerdaverse@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 25 days agomessage-square20linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaree8CArkcAuLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·25 days agolook at the footnotes for the graphs: Corporate profits* Labor compensation† that dagger is quite ambiguous.
minus-squareDonkter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·25 days agoThey run this headline but to them they’re just remarking on the weather. “Oh, seems like profits are going to capital today. Oh well, that’s the invisible hand of the market I guess. Nothing sinister here.”
minus-squareShellbeach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·25 days agoTo be fair, that’s not their place to get outraged. They should report all facts like the weather and leave the opinion up to their readers.
minus-squareIronBird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·25 days agolol, the WSJ is owned by Murdoch. it’s just fox news for rich people who think they’re smarter than they are.
look at the footnotes for the graphs:
Corporate profits*
Labor compensation†
that dagger is quite ambiguous.
They run this headline but to them they’re just remarking on the weather.
“Oh, seems like profits are going to capital today. Oh well, that’s the invisible hand of the market I guess. Nothing sinister here.”
To be fair, that’s not their place to get outraged. They should report all facts like the weather and leave the opinion up to their readers.
lol, the WSJ is owned by Murdoch. it’s just fox news for rich people who think they’re smarter than they are.