This article mentions scientific studies that support its myriad factual claims but doesn’t cite any of them. There is a lot of low-quality, tentative research about the health benefits of various diets. A serious discussion would need to include the limitations of such studies for the food in question.

This post seems to have little to do with science at best. At worst it invokes pseudoscience “superfood” health nonsense.

Is this the same palm that they clear cut rainforests for? The cutting for palm oil (that’s in basically all candy) is absolutely disastrous.

What an absolute garbage article.