• CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Nikes are bar none the worst shoes people try to have me repair. They are made from shitty criminally overpriced plastic and foam that decomposes and falls apart in the box let alone after someone wears them

      • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        18 days ago

        From my point of view athletic shoes aren’t really a thing that can be effectively repaired because even the nice ones use plastics that aren’t easy to work with after they’ve been worn. I can usually do something but its sentiment that keeps them going not quality. But really the lesson I try to teach people is to not give a fuck about the name on the shoe. It vastly more important to know how a shoe is supposed to fit on your foot and that it feels comfortable long term.

        Edit: I will add a few names to avoid pretty much entirely though. Post-1988 Cole Haan (owned by Nike), Louis Vuitton and Ecco

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          18 days ago

          To elaborate on the “go for the fit, not the name”, there’s a common belief that shoes need some time to break in before they feel comfortable. This is only true if you get shoes that don’t really fit your foot. There’s more to feet variations than just the length. I learned that the first time I got lucky and one of the few shoes I was trying on in my mad dash to get shoes and go do something else asap fit my foot properly. It immediately made me realize that I need patience when getting shoes and to never buy a shoe that doesn’t feel great right away.

          If you’re going for a designer shoe, I bet the odds of it perfectly fitting your foot are low, unless maybe you have the same foot type as Michael Jordan or whichever athlete’s name they are putting on the shoe, assuming that athlete’s foot was even part of the design at all. For all we know, they rip those shoes off as soon as the cameras aren’t watching because it was purely a marketing thing.

        • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Why Ecco? I’ve been wearing the same pair of sneakers by them for a decade now and they’re still holding up well. Have they gotten worse in recent times?

          • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 days ago

            The ones I see coming into the shop are usually about a year or two old and the soles are turning into a sticky powder-like consistency. That in and of itself isnt the problem but because the uppers are attached to the insole by a thin very exposed thread that has been melted into the now crumbling sole I can’t remove enough of the old material to get any suitable adhesives to stick without cutting that structurally fundamental stitch.

            The sneakers might hold up better but must just not hold up well enough for folks to bring them to me

            • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 days ago

              Good to know. I have a pair I bought early this year and have been wearing them almost daily. If they come apart in that time frame, that’s gonna suck, because they weren’t cheap.

          • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            The quality of the man-made materials has diminished. People have complained that the plastics literally flake off and crack after about 6 months of wear and tear. The stitching is pretty weak, too.

            Source: Sneakerhead friend.

            • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              The chemicals that went into making plastics and related polymeric materials last longer and be more flexible were found to be horrible for people and the environment. Basically a long list of cancer causing forever chems.

      • comador @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I have a pair of redwings I’ve had repaired 3x over the last 14 years. They’re expensive, but worth adding to the list.

      • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I wouldn’t expect any sneaker to be repairable. I switched to OnCloud and love them, Hoka is another solid brand.

        For repairable shoes, leather Goodyear welt is where to start. Best entry level brand is Thursday Boot company, but Redwing is super popular too.

        • techt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 days ago

          Seconding Thursday boots; I love the fit and style. I wanted a leather daily driver I wouldn’t feel too bad about getting some damage on. Hurt a lot for awhile, but no regrets obviously.

      • Oofnik@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        If you’re talking about easily available running shoes, there are still select New Balances that are union made in the US (as of a couple of years ago).

        If you’re looking for just sneakers, there are a ton made in Europe you can get shipped to north america! I have Vegas at the moment

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        At least when it comes to running shoes, I’m of the opinion that the shoe chooses you. Go to a running store and try on a few brands, find the one that feels the best. Buy one pair from that store; every subsequent time you buy running shoes you know the band and model and can buy it wherever is cheaper.

    • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 days ago

      I don’t repair shoes, but I work in a place that sells them and I know exactly what you mean. They’re shit. Adidas are the better of the big 2 brands.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          18 days ago

          Pumas last forever in my experience.

          I also like to get them over Adidas since that was the one of the two brothers who was not a literal Nazi

        • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 days ago

          IMO Puma do the best quality gear out of the major sportswear brands, and they’re usually amongst the cheapest. I find most of their shoes a bit ugly, but I do like the Palermos.

        • Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 days ago

          Anecdotal, but I just replaced my favorite pair of Pumas, which were at least 12 years old. Granted I didn’t wear them every single day, but at least 2 or 3 days a week for 12 years is pretty good in my book. I’ve had to replace Adidas sooner than that with less wear, but they still last pretty long and I’ll confidently buy both brands. I’d never buy Nike (and wouldn’t wear most Nikes either honestly, just not my personal taste in style)

          For some reference, here’s a picture of maybe 2/3 of my shoes, many of which are Pumas. There’s also a couple pairs of Keds in there, but they’re more recent and I don’t know yet how they hold up long term comparatively

          • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            18 days ago

            Hey, I am also a fan of rotating my shoes. They do seem to last longer that way and are more useful over a longer period of time. I still have Pumas from years ago. They start as my indoor workout shoes, then they are the outdoor casuals, then outdoor workers. I move them to dirtier duty over time. My oldest pair (~15yrs) are on dog-poop duty and now never come inside, but they are about to retire permanently. The hole in the side is now letting in too much moisture so my sock gets soaked. They’ve been good pooper troopers!

      • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        As someone with wide feet, Nike seems to be the only one making shoes that even fit my feet. There’s been numerous Adidas shoes that I wanted to get but the fit is just way too narrow.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Look at Keen or Altra. No idea on the ethicality of either of those though. At this point, I assume all companies are evil unless proven otherwise and try to pay attention and remember when they are evil.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 days ago

      Huh, I would have never thought to ask about most mass produced shoes. I guess my redwing boots are fairly mass produced, and ive gotten those resolved, but even my merril boots I dont think of as being repairable.

      I used to work as a bike mechanic in my teens, and it was pretty standard for shops to have a ‘no department store’ policy for repairs. We’d chance a tube, but trying true a wheel, or properly set breaks and gear on those soft metal, low presicision components just wasnt worth it.

      • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        I won’t say it’ll always be a good looking repair but it’ll be functional. Always worth it to let one of us take a look

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      I have never had shoes that fit my feet. Ever.

      How hard/expensive would it realistically be to design and build/have built my own shoes?

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        $500-2000 depends on what sort of shoe, where you buy it and so forth. If you go to a poor country it can be had for a lot less though. It might well be worth to have that vacation and find a shoemaker. You certainly will not exploit them nearly as badly as Nike.

  • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    18 days ago

    I resolved never to buy or wear Nike back in the late 90s. The companies practices are abominable but I also hated the culture of conspicuous consumption and the way people believed it gave them license to shit on others for not turning themselves into a walking ad. I grew up poor, so I know the feeling of being made to feel less-than because I got Pro Wings on instead of Jordans.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Why are old republicans so fucking weird looking.

    While Knight is generally reluctant to give interviews, he spoke with the New York Times in October 2022 regarding his support for Republican candidates. He argued Oregon’s government had drifted too far to the left and described himself as “more conservative than Nike,” responding to criticism of him backing an anti-abortion candidate which apparently contrasted with the company’s image of supporting progressive social justice causes.[109] Nike itself donated $75,000 to Drazan and Johnson’s Democratic opponent, Tina Kotek, the eventual winner of the election. - WIKIPEDIA

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 days ago

      Not just the old ones, many of them in the administration look super strange with even weirder views.

      One looks like they fought a lawnmower at a barbershop and lost, another looks like a fanfic witch from The Matrix, several of them look like cast members from The Witch (movie), others have…odd features that make them look like WW2 villains or slightly methed out. And all of them are batshit insane.

      You can’t even find people like that in a big city.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    18 days ago

    He sells a running shoe. A shoe folks. Now he thinks he has the ability to shape the worlds future because of all the money he made exploiting the producers of the shoes and gouging the customers of the shoe. What a fucking stretch. What is with these “too much money” guys?

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      They have severe OCD Hoarding Disorder, and they have a serious compulsion to hoard money, even when they have far more than they or their descendents can ever spend.

      If this was someone hoarding anything else at that level, cats, rusty cars, newspapers, junk, etc., the government would step in, remove their treasure, and get that person the mental help they require. We should do the same with Financial Hoarders - detain them and get them the mental health care they require, and remove their hoard that is making life difficult for their neighbors. If they were hoarding cats, we’d put them up for adoption, so their financial hoard should be redistributed to the citizens.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    18 days ago

    Because otherwise there would be a small risk that money would go to taxes instead and help people who need it.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    18 days ago

    This is exactly why we shouldn’t have billionaires. It’s literally impossible to spend a billion dollars on things for yourself, so what’s left but to spend it on manipulating other people.

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        “I don’t want to live in a world where my company isn’t the one company making the world better”

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    18 days ago

    After the recent election? You can kiss that fucking money goodbye. Have fun losing big.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 days ago

    Again

    Prohibit billionaires

    Cap all netwoths at 10-20 million dollars per person, tops.

    Companies should not be worth more than 1 billion dollars, cap it.

    Anything over that has automatically 100% go to taxes

    Well end up with -instead of one trillion dollar compant- tens of thousands of centillion dollar worth companies, you know, those that aren’t too big to fail and that won’t need bailouts

    Well end up with a government that gets so much tax income that it can afford free education, free healthcare, hell, UBI even.

    Noone will be super rich and or powerful ever again, no one will be able to usurp all resources for themselves.

    Humanity spent 2000 years on perfecting the “0.1% must get as Uber rich as possible” and we got it down to an art to concentrate as much wealth as possible with as little people as possible. It is NOT normal, it is NOT acceptable, ajf it has to stop NOW! It’s destroying our world, literally, as these assholes are the main drivers behind climate change.

    Here I am making sure to use as little water as possible and all of my life long work gets thrown into he garbage because miss multimillionaire needs to do grocery shopping with her fucking private jet.

    While on this bandwagon, ban all private jets, even for politicians. Maybe maybe we can keep a few as a sort of air ambulance or something z that should be fine, but all the rest, BAN IT. Same for theega yachts, outright world wide ban.

    It is bizarre to me that most people just act as if all this is perfectly fine and acceptable. There is no right, no reason why anyone should have a higher net worth than (say) 10 million, so why do we allow this to happen in the first place?

    Haven’t we learned anything?