• @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    218 months ago

    Fairly certain this headline has been floating around for years. It’s always just concepts and never something an airline has ever hinted at implementing.

    • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      68 months ago

      The FAA absolutely wouldn’t allow this for the ridiculous safety risks this involves. Can you imagine slamming your head into the seat in front of you during turbulence? There’s also no way to brace yourself and protect your head.

  • Binthinkin
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I stopped flying domestic after I went to Africa via LA and saw how terrible US travel actually is.

    You all are getting not only ripped off, but the service and pay is way below what those airlines workers deserve.

    Travel in the US is so oppressive it’s no wonder the folks living there are so pissed.

    You guys gets nothing for your dollars. It’s sad to watch.

  • @Sigmatank@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    138 months ago

    See… I have seen this a number of times, but honestly, I don’t think space is the biggest issue in a plane, I always assumed it was weight. So if you pack in more people they’re going to be heavy + their luggage so it’s not going to save the airline that much money, but people would HATE this, so I don’t see it happening yet.

    • @B1naryB0t@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      Weight isn’t that much of an issue as long as it’s evenly distributed. Luggage weight limits are only really there to protect workers loading the plane.

      This headline was talked about by an airline executive who claimed it would be with the goal of making a plane ticket as low as 5 euros for a short flight

      • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        22
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They’ll always make some promise on price to get you to accept the ridiculous proposal upfront. Then, when it becomes the norm they’ll be jacking prices up to what they were before when you had legroom.

        Remember how Netflix and streaming services were supposed to be cheaper and ad free? Now it’s more expensive than cable and the ads are back. Never believe a capitalist won’t take every opportunity to squeeze more profits out of his business.

      • @Luckybuck@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Airline pilot here, you’d be surprised how often I’m at max takeoff weight. Especially during the summer. This looks like you’d cram like 40 more pax on board which would for sure cause all sorts of weight issues. The newest configurations have added about ten seats and that’s already pushing it, but I’d imagine they’d want to try this on the short haul routes as you can’t take the same fuel when dealing with high loads.

        You have to understand that everything in aviation is stretched to it’s theoretical max already. Fuel savings of 3% is airline dominance. Overselling flights for load factors gaining an extra 2 percent? Industry standard. Building schedules for crews down to the minute so they are technically illegal if something causes a delay? Worth it. But you can get a ticket to fly a thousand miles for 80 bucks on a low cost carrier, so the rest have to squeeze too. If they haven’t implemented something like this, there is a glaring flaw logistically or legally.

  • AllahFucksKids
    link
    fedilink
    18 months ago

    Keep in mind the gentleman in this photo is Asian, so about a head shorter and MUCH smaller frame than a western man. Not to mention us westerners are often obese. Also don’t forget this guy has not an ounce of ass to spill over that seat. This guy is like the limit for this seat, so yea. You couldn’t sell these seats to anyone but women, children, and the malnourished. Not coming to the USA or Canada, cause who the FUCK are they gonna sell tickets to? Maybe they’ll get this going in the UK. Those Brexiters are fucking retards. They’ll vote in anything if you say it’ll hurt the immigrants.