• occultist8128
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      See I get the point of people hating what they call ‘AI’ here, I totally get it but I can’t see people using wrong terms since I know the correct one. The big corpos already misuse the term saying everything they made AI without specifying what kind of AI it is and people here that I assume techie also went to the wrong path (so you guys sounds the same as those evils, and u fell on the marketing). It’s not about whataboutism — it’s fixing what people always normalize using wrong terms when talking about technical stuff. I don’t care if you still don’t get it tho, I do what I can for saying the truth. And I don’t think you do know what ‘whataboutism’ really is.

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Providing a counterexample to a claim is not whataboutism.

      Whataboutism involves derailing a conversation with an ad-hominem to avoid addressing someone’s argument, like what you just did.

        • occultist8128
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, go cry about it. People use AI to help themselves while you’re just being technophobic, shouting ‘AI is bad’ without even saying which AI you mean. And you’re doing it on Lemmy, a tiny techno-bubble. Lmao.

          • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No one is crying here aside some salty bitch of a techno-fetishist acting like his hard-on for environmental destruction and making people dumber is something to be proud of.