• thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This article is idiotic. “There are a number of steam deck killers already on the market”

    Okay then why haven’t they killed the steam deck? Because they fucking aren’t steam deck killers, you can’t compete with that gaming library built in. I don’t give a shit how much better it performs on paper, if it’s pain in the ass to run games nobody will want it over a deck. Oh I have to install windows? Fuck that. So fucking tired of the “Insert Product Name Killer” thing. It’s bullshit

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Steam Input & double touchpad is also an insane feature. Right now my main game is Dofus : a turn based tactical MMORP. This game is probably one of the most keyboard+mouse I could have thought of, however it has A LOT of keyboard shortcut. I maybe spent one hour fine tuning my layout and now it feels almost better playing it in console mode.

      Turning a PC game into a console game like this almost feels like magic, I really love this big boy and really hope it will have successors in the distant future.

      And also this game is not even on steam, the global openness of Valve letting me do whatever the f**k I want with my device is very welcome.

        • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The UI can be a bit tedious but it is intuitive, with a bit of training and exploration you should be able build anything you have in mind. Enhancing community layout can also help, for example I usually map back buttons to joystick buttons because it would hurt my thumbs.

          If you want a fun thing to start exploring, I’d suggest touch and radial menus. They are a pretty unique feature and it’s pretty easy to make them useful on games with keyboard shortcuts mapped to some settings.

          Aslo, have a try on online tutorials 🙂

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This article is idiotic. “There are a number of steam deck killers already on the market”

      Okay then why haven’t they killed the steam deck?

      Um… seems you overlooked that the line links on an earlier article by them: Supposed Steam Deck killers are missing the point

      They use that term in reference to that earlier article.

      • StarManta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sentence in the article, even if linking to an older article, should still make sense as a sentence on its own. Without the word “supposed” as the older article has, it just doesn’t.

    • Kyoyeou (Ki jəʊ juː)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Duh, of course they are “Steam Deck Killer” I know what I am talking about playing “Wild Star” on my Windows powered consol that last 2 hours, you know, the “World of Warcraft Killer”

    • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jesus it’s like when the iPhone showed up and then suddenly every dumbphone with a touchscreen was an “iPhone-killer”

      I remember the comparison on TV crowning the LG Voyager a superior.

  • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Except Valve said they don’t want a mid-gen refresh. They want game developers to have a fixed target for performance optimalisation.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      A mid gen refresh wouldn’t change the performance target, just offer a better screen or something like that.

        • Voytrekk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          They can offer a better screen without changing resolution. Better color accuracy, VRR, and maybe OLED would improve the screen without changing the performance target.

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can improve the screen without impacting performance. Larger screen, smaller bezels, better colors, OLED, matte finish (on cheaper models), better touch accuracy, etc.