• blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    They are “media transformers” and might be useful if limited to it.

    Knowledge retrieval certainly not, as “they” know nothing besides how likely one data fragment is to appear near other data fragments.

    • death
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve tested it with both python and Cisco iOS pretty thoroughly and it very convincingly gets things wrong a lot.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The problem with that is the constant hallucinations and complete lack of correctness checks.

        • death
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            So your overall point is that AI is a better search engine. “It’s like google, but better.”

            This is both likely true, and no where near fantastical enough to justify the trillion dollar hype cycle.

              • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Anyone who has used intranet search engines at large companies

                Sharepoint search functionality comes to mind. Our team commonly refers it as write-once storage as once you throw something in there you’ll never find it again. And yes, we stole the term from somewhere.

              • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                “Fixes companies internal documentation” is actually a huge get for AI, and would be worth some real hype, but yeah.

                That’s still peanuts compared to the marketing, which is why people are getting pretty tired of the whole AI push. The actual, incremental improvements are being run over roughshod by snake oil salesmen.

                  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    The thing is that this is increasingly not true, hasn’t been true with blockchain and crypto that was all garbage and no substance, not with the metaverse hype, not with any of the hype Elon Musk tried to create (hyperloop?) and not with AI as a worker replacement.

                    There just isn’t any useful bit that sticks around in many cases and where there is those useful bits were never part of the hype or have been around for much longer than the hyped part.