Infosec.Pub
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
vitonsky@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

Browser extensions spy on you, even if its developers don't

vitonsky.net

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • foss@beehaw.org
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • opensource@lemmy.ml
  • hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
  • hackernews@derp.foo
148
external-link

Browser extensions spy on you, even if its developers don't

vitonsky.net

vitonsky@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • foss@beehaw.org
  • firefox@lemmy.ml
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • opensource@lemmy.ml
  • hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
  • hackernews@derp.foo
I've developed a few browser extensions, and every week I receive numerous emails with "revenue offer". Some experienced developers know that offers like these will inject malware into the browsers of your users, but scammers who make these offers will not tell you about it. They offer "integrations" that don't look so suspicious. Imagine how many developers have accepted these offers. Then look at the number of extensions in your browser and think about how much risk there is that you have an extension with malware.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Or maybe only install extensions from trusted sources developers.

    • 2Xtreme21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think the point is that even if an extension comes from a trusted source, the developer could fairly easily push out an update that turns the extension into malware. Check the GitHub link in another comment below where the developer posts the solicitation emails he gets on a regular basis offering to monetize his extension. He isn’t selling out, but maybe not every dev is as willing as he is to forgo a potentially lucrative offer.

      • RdVortex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        And there are cases where this has already happened: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/-particle-chrome-extension-sold-to-new-dev-who-immediately-turns-it-into-adware/ There are probably more recent cases too, but this was the first one I could find.

    • TheEntity@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      To be specific: from trusted developers. Installing them only from the official repository (is it still possible to reasonably install them any other way?) won’t help if a dev sells such an addon. On the other hand I cannot imagine someone like Raymond Hill (the uBlock Origin dev) doing it, considering his track record.

      • redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, that’s what I meant.

  • kindenough@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    Firefox will disable extensions in private mode if you want to

  • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Exactly why most enterprise organizations disable them. You should too if you’re doing anything sensitive data.

    • munderzi@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s why on my work PC I use a completely vanilla Firefox, gotta live with the ads. But I’m not risking giving full access to website content to any extension

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

  • igorlogius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think i remember a post not to far back with a similar topic. Not sure if it was from the developer of the hooverzoom extension itself, but it definitly referenced some offers they collected.

    edit: just noticed, that the article also references the offers (ref. https://github.com/extesy/hoverzoom/discussions/670 )

    • Coolcoder360@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love the offer of almost $15k to then say they can bargain if the users are active, like if it’s worth that much without active users then that’s definitely shady.

  • yuunikki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I thought my ISP already had this data and is selling it. Should I go make sure all my extensions are 100% kosher?

    • beaubbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Your ISP cannot read https data in transit. Extensions can because the page is now rendered on your local browser.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thank you!

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.97K users / day
  • 8.91K users / week
  • 14.7K users / month
  • 27.4K users / 6 months
  • 625 local subscribers
  • 79.8K subscribers
  • 17.2K Posts
  • 693K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org