• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are things “shocking” at this point? The US doesn’t offer any paid maternal leave. Report after report notes how much inflation and stagnant wages are impacting the average person. Follow the logic and this is an expected conclusion.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wasn’t that a huge point of the feminist revolution? To get women out of the kitchen (ie, out of their homes, away from where their children are) and into the office?

    • justhach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The choice to do so, yes. Not the material conditions that make it absolutely necessary for both parents to work full time just to stay afloat.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When you double supply, the value of each unit of supply goes down. This exact situation was predicted.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s only true if demand remains constant. It’s also an incredibly cynical way to look at the labor market. This is a result of the continuing gutting of the middle class and concentration of wealth in the hands of an ever shrinking pool of the ultra wealthy. The answer to why it’s no longer possible to support yourself on the pay of the majority of jobs even working full time isn’t “too many workers”, it’s the leeches at the top taking the majority of the profits.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            it’s the leeches at the top taking the majority of the profits

            Why now though? Why didn’t this happen 50 years ago? 100 years ago? Have people suddenly become greedy and were somehow not greedy before? No, something (or somethings) have changed in the last few decades that brought this about.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why now though? Why didn’t this happen 50 years ago? 100 years ago? Have people suddenly become greedy and were somehow not greedy before? No, something (or somethings) have changed in the last few decades that brought this about.

              Oh, that’s super easy, Reagan happened. It just takes a while for unstable systems to reach a tipping point. Reagan put that brain fart out there, and then the GOP picked up that ball and ran with it for all they were worth. They know a good grift when they see one.