Who’s on the list now…

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Having the aft runway aiming directly at the forward portside lift fan doesn’t seem smart.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Why do they even need runways for taking off? Yeah you want to make sure your engines start but it’s not like you need to reach a specific speed to get in the air nor do you need to be generating lift.

      Imagine how much more quickly you could react by just dropping all your aircraft off the side at the same time (with engines running) rather than be bottlenecked behind individual runway use

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Those carriers are amphibious, they land on water. Presumably they want to be able to operate on the surface as well.

    • NaibofTabr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      What could possibly go wrong?

      …also can you imagine the off-center torque you’d get if you actually fired one of those turret guns?

      …and what happens if one of those big turbines fails? Everybody just dies? No way that thing is staying level with only 3 fans running.

      everything about this design is stupid

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      21 minutes ago

      I was about to say it would just work like the old ski ramp decks but the fans have to be pushing air down sooo

      E) Although, since it’s all Stark tech, there’s no reason it can’t have thrusters that activate when that fan is switched directions to give the jets a boost of lift like a bird riding a thermal. That could make for a pretty badass takeoff scene