How the U.S. government came to rely on the tech billionaire—and is now struggling to rein him in.

  • @chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20410 months ago

    That’s easy…the US needs to asset imminent domain on starlink. You don’t fucking blackmail the government.

    • uphillbothways
      link
      fedilink
      107
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And SpaceX as a whole. It’s entirely government funded anyway. Should have kept that money in NASA where it belonged. Fortunately, there’s an easy way to put it all right back.

      (Also, archive link of top article here: https://archive.is/H6rzo )

      • city cat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        85
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        not entirely government funded, but enough that, if they withdraw funding, it would totally collapse.

        the entire argument that “private companies do it cheaper” is mostly because they cut corners, skirt regulations, and screw over employees to do business on the cheap. then, we find out there may be massive security breaches like, oh, chatting with Putin and god knows who else…

        • keeb420
          link
          fedilink
          810 months ago

          Part of the problem is nasa seems to be very risk adverse now. Letting private companies take the risk is one way to get around that. I’m just glad we don’t have to depend on russia to get to space or the iss.

        • @CoderKat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          Don’t forget potentially underpay people. I don’t believe that’s happening for SpaceX specifically, but it does for many other competitors to government jobs. Government jobs aren’t necessarily super high pay, but they usually have solid pay with excellent benefits, pension, and work/life balance.

          So when jobs move from the public to private sector, it often comes at the cost of employees. And in some extreme cases, employees are paid so little that they have to rely on government benefits to get by, which is extremely dumb. That’s subsidizing the private sector.

          • BarqsHasBite
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            From what I’ve heard it’s true. If you have a job offer from NASA and one from SpaceX, the NASA one is better.

      • @photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -110 months ago

        We would’ve never gotten propulsive landing so quickly purely through NASA. See how far behind the SLS was. And SpaceX’s funding comes mostly from private equity.

        • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3510 months ago

          Bullshit.

          The reason is NASA’s budget kept getting slashed despite NASA making a profit since it’s inception.

          We gave them less money so progress would be slow and salaries wouldn’t be competitive and then it could be privatized like so many sectors before it.

          Because the wealthy can’t buy stock in NASA.

          • Kes
            link
            fedilink
            510 months ago

            NASA’s budget isn’t the only reason SpaceX has been able to innovate faster. NASA is incredibly risk averse, as their failures reflect onto the US government and by extension their budget. Even when safety isn’t important such as with unmanned rockets, NASA doesn’t want news headlines blasting them for their rocket’s tendencies to blow up. SpaceX, by being a private company, is free to take risks and have rockets explode (if they’re unmanned that is) without much repercussions as they’re a private company, not the US government. They’ve had 7 unmanned rockets explode and several more reusable lander’s fail in their course to develop cheaper, reusable rockets, which had NASA done themselves would have been a national embarrassment, but because it was a private company they were free to take those risks to learn from their mistakes

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              11
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The whole point is that there shouldn’t be an absence. The absence is there because of the private corporations. This is another insidious tendril of capitalism.

              • @photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                510 months ago

                I agree wholeheartedly. Public money is being funneled into the MIC, of which SpaceX is now an integral part. If that same money or even a significant fraction had been instead alotted to NASA since the moon landings, we’d have bases on Titan already.

                However, I want to see us touch the stars. And right now, it’s pretty much only SpaceX that has the drive and capital to get there.

            • BarqsHasBite
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              That’s an odd question because government programs aren’t and shouldn’t be in areas to make a profit, aka act like a private company. They need to act where private sector can’t, won’t, or can’t do it well and when there is an important stake. Eg roads, schools, healthcare, police, firefighters, etc. This is why people are telling you it’s unlikely SpaceX would be around without government contracts and funding.

          • @SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -810 months ago

            Privatizing a new space race is maybe the best idea the government has had in decades. NASA isn’t mothballed, quite the opposite. They’re doing more, faster, and with fewer costs.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          810 months ago

          Von Braun came up with the concept for a reusable rocket in the 50s. Not being able to figure it out was not the issue.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              710 months ago

              And a horrible Nazi. Let’s not forget that. The U.S. tried to make everyone forget that.

              But yes, he was a genius.

              • @srgtDodo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                410 months ago

                oh I know! It’s just that some humans throughout history had this insane amount of intelligence and creativity and they jumped our level of technology, and our understanding of the universe by decades, or arguably even more! It always blows my mind that there are people like that

          • @Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            -510 months ago

            You strike me as an academic that struggles to appreciate the value of applied physics and engineering.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              Because Von Braun came up with the concept of the reusable rocket in the 50s?

              • @Comment105@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Because Von Braun’s contribution was small in comparison to what SpaceX R&D contributed.

                But that seems lost on you, it was certainly not obvious to you.

    • @jonne
      link
      3410 months ago

      Or they should’ve never left this to the private sector if there was going to be a strategic component to it. Now they’re at the mercy of an unstable foreign national, who is himself beholden to a bunch of foreign investors.

      • Kes
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        The most insane part is that they never even entered into a contract with Starlink to provide service. Starlink is the backbone of Ukraine’s communications infrastructure, and it’s shocking that the DoD and the Ukraine Armed Forces never thought “hey we should get a contract with Musk so we can ensure he keeps Starlink available throughout the war”. For such a critical service, they were content with dealing with Starlink directly and having Elon subsidize it personally, giving him a large degree of control over one of the most vital components of Ukrainian communications, rather than what they eventually did by going through the DoD to negotiate a contract with Elon using taxpayer dollars

      • TwoGems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Yep this. They privatize everything then complain when it doesn’t go their way.

    • DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You don’t fucking blackmail the government

      lol, only he obviously is, so…
      And I guarantee he was long before starlink - the riches man on earth doesn’t get that way and stay that way without owning at least a handful of politicians (and now his own media outlet of which he has absolute control and millions of existing followers ready to worship his every word).

      I genuinely don’t understand how anyone can still look at anything this man does and think it’s benign, or worse, clueless…

      • iltoroargento
        link
        fedilink
        410 months ago

        With the rich, never attribute to stupidity what you can attribute to malice.

  • @BeMoreCareful@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    On the phone, Musk said that he was looking at his laptop and could see “the entire war unfolding” through a map of Starlink activity. “This was, like, three minutes before he said, ‘Well, I had this great conversation with Putin,’ ” the senior defense official told me. “And we were, like, ‘Oh, dear, this is not good.’ ”

    It’s like the Elon India Tea Company. Strange to think we’ve got so many individuals that rival any sort of elected officials and that our government is becoming aware of this. Elon in particular seems to have the US over several barrels, space, battlefield communications, recharge stations, and now Twitter and AI possibly from the bottom of a k hole.

    Wild, also: I forget how good the New Yorker is. That whole article was fascinating. I feel like I learned a lot and it was interesting.

  • kitonthenet
    link
    fedilink
    7510 months ago

    Boy if only the pentagon had a way to deal with rogue actors, I wonder what they’re in charge of

    • @Savvy95@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      Yes. If he talks with Putin about “government policy” or “international relations” then he has to register with the US government as doing so.

      It’s against the law to privately speak with foreign nations about those categories. It may put you at odds with US policy or maybe you dont see the whole picture, so it’s better in the US eyes to ban foreign diplomacy by private citizens.

      • @pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        🤔 What about Dennis Rodman when he would talk with Kim Jong Il?

        Ooh, he used to talk to Putin too, didn’t he? I wonder if Russia and North Korea were enacting some long-game plan against us.

  • Fuck Yankies
    link
    fedilink
    3310 months ago

    Then the question everyone should ask him on Twitter/X is… “Are you an agent of foreign principal?”

  • @sciawp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    33
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    How can we call our system a democracy when one unelected man can hold so much power?

  • TechDiver
    link
    fedilink
    1910 months ago

    If hitler was alive he’d boast he personally spoke to him as well as if it was some kind of achievement

  • city cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1610 months ago

    “arrest me for espionage and/or treason, please"

    • @Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      They can’t arrest him. In the U.S., we have a wealth threshold above which there is no accountability.

      The only reason trump is being held accountable is because he isn’t a billionaire. If you count his debts, he probably isn’t even a millionaire.

      His son-in-law Jared sold secrets to the Saudis for billions, but now he’s a billionaire so he cannot be held accountable for being a spy and a traitor. That’s how we do things in the U.S. The wealthy cannot be held accountable here.

  • Wr4ith
    link
    fedilink
    1510 months ago

    Struggling implies that they tried anything