• LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Eh, don’t care. A sane person would’ve pick something well established, like a Tata Nexon, a Mahindra XUV400EV or a Citroen eC3. Or in premium segments, a Hyundai Ioniq 5, a KIA EV6 or those BMW cars whose names I don’t remember. Only rich, entitled ancap brats in India would buy something as expensive and proprietary as a Tesla.

      • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Not these specific cars, but there were plenty under Mahindra. e20, e20 Plus, Mahindra (Dacia) Logan, REVAi, Tata Indica Vista EV. There wasn’t a lot of choices in design and utility, like cross, hatchback or SUVs, but there were options. Honestly, the infrastructure was non-existent back then, and is still not that great for cars, so people opt for either the CNG or hybrid models if they want to go the eco-friendly route, but if we are talking about electric two-wheelers, then yes, they’re doing really well in the market.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If anyone’s been to india they will know that self driving cars in india are simply not possible.

  • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m surprised more Native Americans aren’t up in arms.

    (/s because most people don’t get sarcasm)

        • yokonzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s the kind of mentality that leads to misunderstandings. You cannot translate tone through a written medium, that’s why emojis and the /s even exist in the first place

            • yokonzo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes, ofc about your joke and don’t really have an opinion on it, but I am absolutely of the opinion that sarcasm is not compatible with text. What makes sense to you on writing is primed to be readan entirely different way by someone else based on their texting habits and even their current mood, that’s why I think the /s is necessary

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny because “Red Indians” was used by colonial settlers to describe a broad range of people and tribes conquered and subsequently had their culture and families completely demolished by the invading forces. And we still refer to them as “Indians” in education and literature regardless of their preferred preferences!

      /s