• prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    While I think that’s dope it does feel like it gives Russia valid cause to strike them in host countries and kind of feels like a deliberate provocation to do so?

        • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Russia has stated many things which are often contradictory and false.

          Regardless, attacking NATO countries would be strategic insanity.

          • Vilian@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            they are insane tho, but putin don’t want to die, and their fuxked up defense system can’t cope with the ammount of missiles that gonna rain in his head

            • oatscoop@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              They’re not insane: everything they’ve done are things they sincerely thought they could get away with, and up until Ukraine Putin has been correct in that regard.

              Pretending to be crazy is an effective strategy: ironically Nixon popularized it during the cold war.

              Attacking targets in NATO countries (even if “justified”) is going to drastically increase the odds NATO gets directly involved in Ukraine – something Putin absolutely doesn’t want.

          • Old_Geezer@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            33
            ·
            3 months ago

            Regardless, attacking NATO countries would be strategic insanity.

            NATO is weak now. I wouldn’t want to bet on that.

            • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s not even politics, It’s just math. NATO has superiority in economy, industrial output, operational equipment and manpower.

              Plus they’re too close to Russia for asymmetric warfare rules.

              I would bet on it, but I’d sure as hell wish we could all get along instead.

              • Old_Geezer@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                The asymmetric warfare will probably occur in other places around the world. There’s many places to pick. 800 military bases around the world that are vulnerable. The industrial output favours the Russians.

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Um… Is NATO weaker with the addition of Sweden and Finland? I’m not sure what your definition of “weak” means. I thought having more allies is not weak.

        • CptEnder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          If it’s a NATO country the F-16s are the least of their worries and find out what a real 3 day operation looks like.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I would be shocked if Russia did, the west has been pretty limited with allowing Ukrainian strikes with western systems on Russia even to this day. Like it or not I don’t think they would attempt to strike another country because they are scared of relatiation.

        I would be happy to be wrong, because if they do I think the west would join the war or allow Ukraine more Freedom with their systems. Either way the net outcome is Russians still loosing the long game, like they currently are

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Still waiting for the “F-16s delivered to Ukraine” headline instead of these useless stall articles showing off the mistake of not sending them 2 years ago >:(

    spoiler

    Seriously they’re guarding base block F-16s, but a whole fleet of F-15s for Israel is fine because money.

    • benderfend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s all about training. Pilots are one matter. Repair and maintenance crews are another. It’s going to take time unfortunately. Money and logistics aren’t the issue here though.

      • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Motherfucker they’re going to base the planes in Romania. What repair and maintenance crews do they need that don’t already exist?

        • benderfend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Motherfucker… They ain’t basing ALL the planes in other countries… They have to fly the planes out of ukraine if they want to use them or the west is risking being dragged into the war by being a direct participant. No one is prepared for this yet. They are preparing however…

          I feel your pain bro but look into the issue first before talking like a dipshit. Realize that this stuff doesn’t happen overnight please.