Earlier in the pandemic many news and magazine organizations would proudly write about how working from home always actually can lead to over working and being too “productive”. I am yet to collect some evidence on it but I think we remember a good amount about this.

Now after a bunch of companies want their remote workers back at the office, every one of those companies are being almost propaganda machines which do not cite sound scientific studies but cite each other and interviews with higher ups in top companies that “remote workers are less productive”. This is further cementing the general public’s opinion on this matter.

And research that shows the opposite is buried deep within any search results.

Have you noticed this? Please share what you have observed. I’m going paranoid about this.

  • DarkMessiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    267
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yup, corporations need to justify owning the big-ass office buildings they bought out, so they’re paying to make their own opinions be reported on over the actual truth. As usual.

    • jonne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      133
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not just the corporations renting those offices, it’s the politicians of downtown areas that fear a downturn in tax revenue due to more empty offices and less people getting their daily coffee/lunch/after work drinks.

      And of course, if everyone’s working remotely, this means it’s a lot easier to find a better job without even needing to leave the house to interview, which gives employees a better bargaining position (downside is that employers will start looking at employees in lower paying countries as well).

      • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        11 months ago

        downside is that employers will start looking at employees in lower paying countries as well).

        Tale as old as time

      • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s the commercial mortgage backed securities market.

        Remember 2008 when they bundled up all those home mortgages that were based on shitty unpayable loans and sold off securities to retirement funds etc? But then people couldn’t pay and the entire economy imploded resulting in massive bank failures?

        Same deal. All those office space loans have been collateralized into securities. The 1% and the banking industry understand perfectly that if they don’t force people to return to office, the entire system will implode again. Even after Dodd Frank the regulations on over the counter derivatives are still mostly non existent.

      • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        All of this is happening with my company as we speak. I actually did a remote interview today while on my lunch hour. And my current company has just rolled out plans for “clerical help” based out of India. I’m in the U.S.

        • atticus88th@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The city of Seattle was literally crumbling before most of the major tech giants RTO.

          Im not sure Republicans have had much control there in a few decades.

        • jonne
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Eh, all those cities are Democrat run. Economically they’re essentially the same.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I find it real fascinating how many people are blindsided by the fact that the people who own things that focus on making a profit skew the information they put out to benefit themselves. Did they think they were impartial or something? I mean they claim their neutral they don’t ever show that they’re neutral.

    • gornar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      And the proven financial benefit of having people work from home must not be as profitable as corporate real estate, or companies wouldn’t be requiring in-office work again!

  • ScrivenerX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s because a huge amount of business is centered around made up things for going to work.

    Things you need to work in an office: suits, dry cleaning for the suits, dress shoes, a car (because public transportation is woefully inadequate for this reason), gas for the car, maintenance for the car, lunch, daycare, a dog walker, you have less time so you are more likely to eat out for dinner, also more likely to hire maids, you are stuck in a commute and radio is awful, so a music subscription, maybe a new phone, and might have to go out for drinks with the coworkers on the way home.

    Staying at home, and much of the country on highly limited income, taught us how much we spend on the “privilege” of work. Everyone is still shocked at the emotional and opportunity cost work had, we’re just starting to realize that most of what it sold to us either isn’t real or isn’t needed.

    If people don’t go back to work a sea of businesses will fail.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      11 months ago

      You missed the most important thing. Real estate investments that aren’t allowed to go down in value, which they would if offices became superfluous. Just imagine how many buildings would become “worthless”/could be used for something else.

          • bemenaker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            The video conferencing software that saved the world during covid and made all the companies survive the lockdown.

          • AttackPanda@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            I feel like we need to talk about this more. Their whole model is promoting remote experiences and yet they are also forcing folk back to the office. I can’t think of a reason outside of external pressures that would happen.

      • ScrivenerX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is a huge pressure, but it’s less obvious why a company in a business unrelated to real estate would want real estate prices high.

        The secret is that companies aren’t in the business of making a good or providing a service, they actually are just giant schemes for raising money for “investments”. For example, airlines don’t make their money off of selling tickets, but through prospecting jet fuel. Most companies aren’t as direct and clear about what their business actually is.

        Also the link between real estate and all of jobs isn’t very clear and is very abstract. It’s easy to see the costs and interactions with companies forced by working in an office, it’s difficult to see how a building losing value effects anyone.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        In the Wall Street area of Manhattan, some of the biggest buildings are already being converted to apartments. It’s been a trend for a while, because the older buildings are too expensive to rewire for computers/HVAC.

      • Iamdanno@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        A forward-thinking wealthy person would start buying these buildings at fire-sale prices and converting them to residential buildings.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          You have to be very choosey, because most office buildings aren’t easily convertable

    • BeHappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I love the “might HAVE to go out for drinks with the coworkers on the way home”. This is my most dreaded fear.

      Edit: and clothes/getting ‘ready’ (hair, makeup, underwear, etc.) is double time for women.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Pre-pandemic. Maybe 2005 [?] one of the big American news companies assembles a team of financial experts to study various big companies. Then they deicde to apply all that brain power to an average American family. Husband and wife with three kids, two jobs and two cars. Both have middle class jobs. After running the numbers, the experts told the wife to quit her job. The savings on childcare, running the second car, no fast food dinners, etc. more than made up for the second salary.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you read what I wrote, the experts looked at all aspects of the couple’s situation. The experts decided that the wife’s job was the one to go.

          If you’re having a problem finding dates, maybe you should look at what common factor all your relationships have.

          • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t have a problem finding dates. I don’t want to date. Men aren’t worth the cost, in my experience. But nice attempt, trying to attack me personally to cover up your misogyny and the misogyny of the “experts”" you quote. Such a “surprising” tactic. Too bad for you that I’m quite comfortable in my choice to live relatively male-free.

            Tacking the words “expert” and “study” onto misogynistic propaganda doesn’t make it scientifically rigorous. And even though there is still truth in women making less in general, that’s changing. Women need men less and less every year. Thankfully.

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              You funny.

              If you look up the actual article you’ll see it went as I wrote. In that particular case, the wife was earning less, so it made sense for her to give up her job.

              Anything you’ve added is on you.

              If you’re not dating because ‘men aren’t worth it’ that says more about you than it does about the men.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t care if remote workers are less productive (although I’ve seen no evidence that they are).

    You can’t convince me that spending an hour every morning travelling to get to an office, in order to sit in front of the exact two screens I have at home, is a good use of my time, nor is spending an hour getting home again.

    That’s about 450 hours a year for me. 18 whole days. Those days are mine now, and you’re not having them back.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wish I had the same setup at work as at home. My home dev environment cost 5 times as much.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah when I was originally told I could just work from home forever I invested in a giant monitor and all kinds of tools. Now they changed their mind and want me to go in to an Office with shared desks. No thanks

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Ackshually, they’re two distinct sets of two screens. Unless you’re taking your two monitors to work and back home every day.

      (sorry for the pedantry I’m ashamed)

      • Octavio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        If we wanted to take the pedantry to the next level, we could get into a metaphysical discussion about whether the word “screen” refers to the physical appliance displaying the content or the content itself. When you “share your screen” in a Teams meeting, you don’t box up your monitor and mail it to your coworkers. 🤔

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have at home, is a good use of my time, nor is spending an hour getting home again.

      Yeah, but those are YOUR hours and THEY don’t pay for it, so those hours don’t matter. In fact, it’d be better if you don’t get those hours to yourself. Maybe you’ll have more time to apply to other jobs or something.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      What about 2-3 days a week and an extra week or two of PTO to compensate? I’m trying to think of ways to incentivize more office work that will appeal to stingy boomer leadership and the younger ‘fuck offices’ crowd.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think the only deal I’d take to return to the office every day is a 4 day week. If I have to commute, I also want 4 weeks off.

  • SigmarStern@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have noticed that working remotely really opened up the job market for me. Instead of being limited to where public transportation can bring me within 45 minutes, I can work for any company within Europe from the comfort of my home office. It makes switching jobs so much easier and I am willing to tolerate much less shit before I quit. That degree of freedom might scare companies. They can’t trap me anymore with the costs of uprooting my life for a better job.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never worked from home, but it seems to me that even if everything else were kept equal, you just saved an hour and a half commute plus the cost of doing so, every day! When you add in the lower cost of food and healthier diet eating at home and a whole host of other advantages. It’s a huge win! Congrats.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I worked from home for ~6 months full time, my experience was that I will never do it full time again. For me, it was waking up, watch the same four walls for 8 hours, eat dinner, sleep, repeat. Perhaps my office could have been better but because I was working with support and had to be available on the phone, I could not really leave my computer for an extended period of time (except for lunch break).

        A lot of people make it out to be heaven, working from home. I really missed having people to talk to. I believe that it would have been a much better experience if I could have worked from home 0-5 days per week as I saw fit. Bad morning? Work from home. Waking up fresh? Go to work. I’m assuming that you can walk or bike to work. Few things are worse than being stuck in traffic or being on a crowed bus/train, or missing the bus with 1 min, having to wait 15 min for the next one, when with the bike I can leave whenever I want.

        • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Conversely, I found out just how many spoons I was using to function interacting with folks on a daily basis and that the strains my extroverted colleagues were talking about without having people were things I’d just lived with and normalized for my entire life because our society forced you to be around people all of the time.

          Give me my four walls, pls. I spend every waking hour on a computer anyway, either working or personal, so it’s going to be four walls one way or another.

        • demlet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I think it’s very situational. I’m already a big shut-in. Working full time at home might not be great for my mental health. It’s sad to admit I use work for social contact, but it’s true. If you have good social connections outside of work, great.

          All that said, this whole debate is very classist. There are loads of jobs, including mine incidentally, that require physically being there. I mostly haven’t paid attention to this debate because it doesn’t apply to me or the people I know, and probably never will.

  • aaron_griffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The negativity comes almost entirely from two sorts of people

    1. Rich property owners who are seeing their valuable office buildings plummet in value.
    2. People who socialize primarily with work-mates and don’t have other groups

    To 1, fuck 'em. To 2, eh, maybe find a hobby now that you don’t have to commute 2 hours a day

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      One of my sups from my old job was recently complaining that people weren’t required to come in more than two days a week and pushing to increase it because the office is lonely without them. She and people like her are the absolute worst. Main character syndrome doesn’t even begin to describe them and I wish nothing but the worst for them in life tbh

    • Ataraxia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I say fuck em to 2. I hated those people in the office. They wouldn’t leave me alone. It was irritating.

  • MisterRoboto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    11 months ago

    There’s money in real estate. There’s even more in commercial real estate. There’s less money in commercial real estate that’s vacant because people work from home.

    • Deiv@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not only real estate…cities give incentives to companies that meet a quota of in-office employees since it drives the local economy

  • UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    11 months ago

    Corpo news outlets are spewing out bullshit PR hitpieces to protect their investments on real-estate offices. COVID lockdown got them with their pants down and now are fighting tooth and nail to pull them back up lmao

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep, 100%. They’re fucked too because smaller companies aren’t shying away from remote work. They’ll never kill it now. They reaped the fruit of their shitty investment strategies.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Reminder that Google itself is one of the companies that wants to end remote work so their real estate doesn’t dive in value.

    So don’t be surprised about how search results reflect this bias as well.

    When you’ve fully digested that, think about who owns the systems that keep capitalism in place.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think it’s partially rage bait at this point. At the start of the pandemic remote work was a new idea and it was easy to get views on an article about it. Now you need a shocking title that’ll enrage people to get engagement on the topic.

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It wasn’t a new idea and it wasn’t rage bait. My company internally praised us for increased productivity during the pandemic, and now they’re trying to gaslight us into RTO.

      This isn’t about productivity. These companies are lying. This is 100% about real estate investments, tax breaks, and flexing power over their employees’ lives. They were scared by how much employee power grew during the pandemic and they’ll invent whatever bullshit lie they can to sweep that under the rug.

      • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Since companies adopted computers and the Internet it’s been possible. I remember my dad working from home every now and then. But the idea that almost any desk job could be done remotely full time is new.

        • TurdFerguson@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          The pandemic definitely pushed companies into finally adopting it, but believe me, it was not a new concept. I remember reading an article 20 yrs ago about Best Buy adopting it, for example, and how it increased productivity and morale, etc. Since then, it’s been catching on, I’ve had plenty of friends that have worked from home since long before the pandemic, it’s just that a lot of companies were still afraid of giving their employees that much autonomy.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes and here is some irony I found.

    My company requires us to take various learning course throughout the year. Some assigned - some pick your own. A lot of it is the usual B.S. that everyone has to do.

    I was browsing thru the managerial list and picked one of the ones that sounded interesting the other day about ‘How to be a better Manager’ and smack in the middle of the first chapter was this big video with this woman giving this speech about being accepting of people who wanted/needed to work from home or telecommute.

    My ears instantly perked up.

    The video went on to throw up all this data showing how more and more people were doing this and it had this graph from 2012 on and how this was the natural progression in the workplace and how we as managers needed to be accepting of peoples position and feelings toward this and learn to be accommodating as we would see more of it.

    I was like WTF??!

    When the course ended I scrolled through it looking for a date and I believe it was 2017.

    Amazing how the tune has changed but the data hasn’t.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Corpos actively trying to get people back to the office so middle management doesn’t feel as useless.

    Commutes are a detriment to the worker, but not to the company.

    • GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it’s not so much about middle management. They implement the policies of the actual decision makers.

      I think it’s because the people who actually make these decisions perform their work mostly via face-to-face meetings, handshakes, projecting personal charisma, reading body language, and personal networking. This leads to an overestimation of how much of other jobs depend on time spent in the same room with others.

      The executive imagines the meetings they missed, leading to lost opportunities. So they see a loss of productivity.

      They don’t appreciate how much easier it was to edit that manual or analyze that data without Joe the human tuba trying to breathe around his phlegm in the cube next door, or without the folks three rows over arguing about which director’s vision of Superman was best.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        The executive imagines the meetings they missed, leading to lost opportunities. So they see a loss of productivity.

        This is a fantastic point, and one I had not considered.

        From this standpoint, the side pushing for return to office really does feel like they’re in the right. I think I would argue that a subset of those folks are still pushing a return for the wrong reasons (e.g. thinking that remote work lowers productivity naturally, not just based on an observation of their own missed meetings or face time), but otherwise I agree entirely.

        • Snekeyes@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          They need to fake working and that’s hard to do when remote is based on output. Ie, did the work get done or not. Being a middle manager w people to bother in office means they can fake it or have issues all day and be talking …

      • Tsubodai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        This hits the nail on the head at my work. Immediate manager couldn’t care less where we are, and has said frequently that the team is more productive from home.

        It’s the higher ups that are pushing for return to office, constantly sending out surveys, arranging free-form “open door” meetings and things like that because they’re lost without seeing people face to face.

        I can concentrate far more effectively at home, where I’m in full control of my environment, and I spend up to half of my day in video calls with people in different locations anyway.

    • monobot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Commutes are a detriment to the worker, but not to the company.

      It should be, count commuting in my eighth hour work day and let’s see how much they prefer WFH.

  • tooting_lemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think allot of Banks have a ton of assets tied up in commercial real estate. This is the real reason they are pushing everyone to go back to work. A lot of powerful people will loss money if the commercial real estate market crashes.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      What I don’t understand is, why do companies who don’t make money from real estate give a shit? When everyone at my job who could work from home went home to work, our CEO’s reaction was, “If everyone can work from home, why the hell were we paying all this money for rent?”

      To the extent possible, everyone is still working from home, and where the organization couldn’t get out of leases, they’re planning to let them expire. They’re not spending more money to have people work on site just because they have sunk costs in a lease.

  • new_acct_who_dis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    People working from home aren’t consuming much anymore.

    Of course there’s commercial property leases and micromanaging bosses, but I think the uptick in this messaging is in response to people spending less money.

    Less money on cars, gas, clothes, eating out, fancy coffee, hair/nails, dry cleaning, kid/animal care, gym (?), and probably so much more that I’m not thinking of.

    And when we do spend money on those things, they’re lasting longer and we’re getting more discerning. When I do consider spending money on eating out, I’ll def choose going hungry over getting something lower quality.

      • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Same. I use reclaimed commute time to get groceries and cook now. Wife is thrilled now when I call it ‘my’ kitchen (it was hers by default when my commute + work had me out of the house 12-16 hours a day), and I can whip up a decent meal these days pretty quickly without having to go out

  • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    My whole job revolves around cloud computing platforms, why do I need to be in an office? Yet it’s looking like I’m going to be forced to make the choice of returning to an office I’ve never been to, or holding out until I find a new remote gig, while hurting my family financially.

    The stupidest thing about the whole return to work things is that I’ve seen a lot of jobs and people who were remote prior to COVID are also being forced back into the office as well, creating financial hardships for those people. This is all just a shadow layoff, just a means to trimming the “fat”, and I’m betting they’re going to overcorrect and become even harsher with anyone that wants to not be in the office constantly.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      At my last job my entire team was spread across the country. So when they started making me go back into the office I would have to drive an hour to get to work, just so I could sit at a desk alone and telecommute with my teammates. It was basically a huge waste of time and money for me. So I found a new job and quit. They begged me to stay after I gave notice, despite the fact that I told them ahead of time that I was going to leave if they insisted I go to the office. I guess they thought I was bluffing. They agreed to let me stay WFH after I gave notice and I just laughed.

      • Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        This how they operate. Even though I work from home, I was being completely overworked and stressed out at the end of last year. As soon as my 401k match went through at the beginning of January, I turned in my notice without a new job lined up. I did do one video interview, but didn’t get the gig.

        On my very last day of employment I was contacted by a zone vp and asked to stay. He offered a new position for a pilot they were rolling out and about a $10k increase. I took it. It’s been a lot better, but still sucks so I interviewed with someone else today. Point is, that these big corporations don’t really give a shit about there employees. Regardless of what they say or the BS they plaster all over their websites and social media. You are disposable and they will take advantage of you at every opportunity.

        It’s a shitty way to do business, but it’s up to the individual to look out for themselves and be willing to take some risks. Work hard and learn as much as possible. Make yourself invaluable and you’ll be in a lot better position to make it

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Refuse the RTO and start looking for another job. Don’t quit. They won’t fire you right away, it will take a while. They might even cave if they need you.