• pruwyben
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 months ago

    I feel like this is not so much a meme as just a thing that is wrong.

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 months ago

    Sadly, this is so far over my head that I have to accept it as truth, spread the word with authority, and found a religion based on it

    • Catt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This “proof” is based on a bug in Casio calculators (tested it on the fx-991EX classwitz, got it there too)

      A try to explain it is in this video by Matt Parker. Are exactly the same numbers

    • @pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 months ago

      It’s just an equation that gives you the first few digits of pi if you treat pi as a variable.

      But, pi isn’t a variable, so it’s not a real equation.

      • @xor
        link
        English
        92 months ago

        it’s not treating pi as a variable, though…
        here’s one that does work:
        circumference = 2piradius,
        so, pi = 2*radius/circumference… which is true… (pi is the ratio of diameter to circumference)
        the meme here is just an equation that’s wrong because it’s wrong… pi is being treated as if it’s some value that it’s not in the first equation, and it’s still wrong in the second equation…

        • @pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          pi is being treated as if it’s some value that it’s not in the first equation

          That’s a variable. The value of ‘pi’ is dependent on the rest of the equation.

          If you treat it as a variable, the math gives you 3.1415926536.

    • @DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      Maybe I am also too dumb, but isn’t the issue that the first equation is just wrong? It assumes that pi only equals 3.141592654