• TheRealKuni
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 days ago

    SD3 won’t have the community to tune it because it is proprietary junk and irrelevant now.

    What changed between SDXL and SD3? I’m out of the loop on this one.

    • @randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      517 days ago

      They realized that no matter how much they charged as a one time fee, the people the got the one time fee enterprise license would eventually cost them more in computational costs them the fee. So they switched it to 6000 image generations, which wasn’t enough for most of the community that made fixes and trained loras, so none of the “cool” community stuff will work with SD3.

      • @interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        217 days ago

        Have they considered a community sponsored “group buy” of compute, to just train the model as far as the community will bear ? SDXL was so great, surely 100k people could put 5$ a month toward making monthly improvement open source checkpoints happen ? I don’t see any other financing model work out if the output is open source. It simply can’t be financed after publication. And it won’t get the community support if it’s behind a paywall.

      • @Geologist@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 days ago

        Maybe I’m out of the loop, but I was under the impression people paying for the enterprise tier were largely using the model on their own hardware, and that the removal of this tier was largely just rent seeking by SD against people improving on their model and selling access to a better version.

        Did SD really sell unlimited access to their compute/ image generator for a fixed price? If so that’s just so dumb it’s hard to believe. I only started paying attention to the company recently though, so maybe I’m missing something.