A user on the online forum 4chan has leaked a massive 270GB of data purportedly belonging to The New York Times. This leak includes what is claimed to be the source code for the newspaper’s digital operations.

  • Autonomous User
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    We still have no legal right to use, change and share its source code, control it both ourselves and in groups. It’s still anti-libre software.

    • @seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Anything that may help develop better adblockers/paywall bypasses or exposes how/what of our personal information is collected is a win in my book. And this may very well be none of those things.

      • Autonomous User
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        They only exist when we keep them relevant and we already know we can’t prove it’s private but if it helps some people, that’s good.

      • @0xD
        cake
        link
        English
        -1423 days ago

        Right, because fuck paying for proper journalism. Everything must be free!

        Remind me again, how does that work?

        • @errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1923 days ago

          I pay for the NYT, and yet every other screen is a fucking ad (often the same ad repeated over and over). You already have my subscription money, and unless they decide not to be so greedy (haha), their ads get shoved up my pihole.

        • @noisefree@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          622 days ago

          The inverse of this is where subscription services that previously had no ads for paying subscribers then add in ads on paid plans while also increasing the fees associated. It’s a pretty standard practice, NYT included. Adblocking is necessary.