• mashbooq
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That is the neutral answer. It’s objectively and demonstrably correct.

    • thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think of “politically neutral” and objective as synonymous. I think of politically neutral as attempting to appease or not piss of any sides. Being objective will often piss off one side (and we all know which side that is).

      • josefo@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        if one side is enemy of objective data, you are going to piss them off without even knowing, unless you lie or try to be intentionally vague about everything

        • thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Right and I don’t think there’s anything wrong with not being neutral in that case. The original commenter said it’s “neutral corpo-speak” which I disagree with. Corporations would be all wishy washy or intentionally vague as you mentioned.