• viking
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 months ago

    Github probably didn’t receive a cease and desist yet, but I doubt they’ll put up a fight against Nintendo.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I highly suggest starting to familiarize ourselves with federated git repos. I‘m testing forgejo atm hoping to be able to host it publicly at some point. That way, once something is out there, its pretty much everywhere.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I get that. But I dont think that its possible to really dmca every fork of a repo on 20 countries without running out of resources at some point because when one fork is taken down, people will make 10 more. the important part is discoverability imo. Feel free to educate me in case this is missing a point.

          • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            its easy enough to send angry shit to every server, dmca and whatever rights violations they can think up, and it can become an issue.

            Of course, the Federation is great, but you still need an instance that’s in one of those privacy-oriented countries.

        • kaputter Aimbot@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          – A wild Codeberg appeared. –

          Codeberg is a collaboration platform providing Git hosting and services for free and open source software, content and projects.

          Website: Codeberg.org


          The organization selected the European Union for their headquarters and computer infrastructure, due to members’ concerns that a software project repository hosted in the United States could be removed if a malicious actor made bad faith copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

          Wikipedia: Codeberg e.V.


          In June 2022 the Software Freedom Conservancy’s “Give Up Github” campaign (in response to the GitHub Copilot licensing controversy) promoted Codeberg as an alternative to GitHub.

          Conservancy: Give Up GitHub!

          • Atemu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Certainly better than the U.S. in that regard but I wouldn’t consider Germany “resilient” either.

          • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Unfortunately using codeberg itself is kinda crap. Its not the worst thing in the world, but it still has zero discoverability , and is missing features like code search.

            it does have potential though if it is resilient.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The DMCA only applies in the US. Every other country doesn’t give a shit about your DMCA request.

      • eratic@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Federated git repos doesn’t mean that the source code will be replicated across instances. It just means you can do things like create tickets and pull requests across instances.

        • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not sure I understand. I should be able to fork a public repo across instances, no? Why bother otherwise?

          • Slotos@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            Federation has nothing to do with that capability. git clone exists since the beginning of git.

            • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              hmmmm… I see your point. Maybe I wasnt explaining my point clear enough. Right now, I cant see someones fork of some software if I’m on some gitlab which is not federated afaik. I should have said discoverability I guess. Does that make more sense?

              • r00ty@kbin.life
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I mean, not saying anyone should, because evading copyright is bad. But technically, you could run say forgejo as an onion service. Connecting git to clone from it would take some extra steps but, if hidden well it’d make it somewhat harder to take down.

                • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Evading oppressive mechanics is always a great idea imho but I digress.

                  I’m not really talking about making it unable to be taken down, which is already what happens when you put it in a non public repo. I’m talking about exhausting the corpo and damaging their image for going after people using software to play their bought games on their pc. It could kick off a trend of peeps shaming corpos (especially nintendo) for going after legit players who want control of their devices and property. (whoever feels like pointing out that “technically you just own a license”, just dont).

                  • r00ty@kbin.life
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Well, I run forgejo for my own stuff. So, let’s say I decided to host something that is subject to a copyright complaint. As soon as people start using your repo and their lawyers get a whiff of it, they’ll just take the IP of your server and DMCA the owner of the IP. Whether it be me, or the host. It’s an entity they can go after and will need to yield to appropriate law. The effect would be the same as the DMCA going to Github.

                    But on tor, it hides the entity operating and running the server. Making it a lot harder to find the person to even send the DMCA to, let alone start the legal wheels turning, if it were ignored.

                  • nintendiator@feddit.cl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I’m talking about exhausting the corpo and damaging their imag

                    All you’ll be exhausting is an AI. They’re using AIs now to write the DMCA requests, which actually does lead me to wonder if such takedown requests are even legal (an AI can’t, to my knowledge, legally represent the interests of a legal person). But the point is, if you’re thinking of “exhausting a corpo” you’re thinking it wrong.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          When I create a fork (in the web UI) does my instance not git clone from the source instance? Not going around cloning random federated repos I can see, but…