• viking
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    As a hiring manager, I’d never consider someone for the role they took on yesterday when recruiting. That just doesn’t make any sense.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      As a hiring manager I am sure you’re aware that when consulting professionals in the recruiting field, many people are told to replace their old title with their new one. The position they reach is more important when moving up than the one they had for X period of time, and many employers won’t dig too deep into it, especially if the potential employee can sell themselves.

      • viking
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        That practice does not exist in my country.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Or it does and you never thought much on it.

          On a CV someone would put X time at Y company, was role Z. How long role Z was is not normally listed and if I got a multi page CV with every role listed at each company I would toss it.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      You want people who other people vetted as good enough to do <blank>. It’s often a first pass filter to even get to your inbox. Why wouldn’t you read the rest of the resume.

      • viking
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I read the rest of the resume, but I evaluate the people based on a proven track record, not on the newly appointed role with zero history.