I use Fedora 38, it’s stable, things just work, and the software is up-to-date.

  • dotslashme
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch Linux because it has sane defaults, is rolling, up to date, helpful community, awesome wiki and is minimalistic.

      • dotslashme
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it has almost no defaults, allowing you to tailor the installation to your needs.

    • KRAW@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That really depends on your definition of “sane defaults.” Even a lot of the computer science professionals I work with wouldn’t consider Arch Linux defaults as sane. I picture sane defaults to include a lot more basic functionality that Arch doesn’t have out of box (automatic suspend, desktop environment, lock screen, etc.).

      I use Arch for the exact same reason you do though. Once you get past the tedious stuff like setting up your networking stack, setting up idle suspend, etc. it’s nice to choose whatever WM/DE you want and customize it how you want.