Public officials in Tennessee can now refuse to grant a marriage license to anyone at their own discretion, for any reason.

Public officials in Tennessee can now refuse to grant a marriage license to anyone at their own discretion, for any reason.

Republican Gov. Bill Lee signed into law House Bill 878 on Wednesday, which took effect immediately. The bill — just a few sentences in length — only states that “a person shall not be required to solemnize a marriage.” Only state notary publics, government officials, and religious figures can “solemnize” a marriage in Tennessee, according to state code.

None of the sponsors behind the bill have been made public statements on its introduction or passage, nor have they given comment to media organizations. The only known remarks regarding the law from state Rep. Monty Fritts (take a guess), who sponsored it in the House, are from February of last year, when he spoke to the state Subcommittee on Children and Family Affairs.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    1231·
    4 months ago

    “As societal views change about what constitutes a marriage, officiants must be able to refuse to solemnize marriages that are contrary to their beliefs. The government has a responsibility to protect the exercise of religious beliefs," he said, via CNN. "Those with the authority to perform civil ceremonies would also be permitted to refuse to solemnize marriage for reasons of conscience.”

    So if someone’s religion did not believe “christianity” was a valid religion, they could refuse to give a license to a christian couple.
    Be careful what power you give the people, they can use it against you.

    • rdyoung@lemmy.world
      441·
      4 months ago

      This is the only way anything like this changes. Hopefully some folks at city hall will do just this and turn it around on the doofuses.

      • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
        14·
        4 months ago

        TIL She had a meeting with the Pope).

        After receiving a surprise phone call from a church official, the Kentucky county clerk says she traveled to Washington, D.C., where she and her husband Joe met the pope Sept. 24 at the Vatican Embassy.

        “I put my hand out and he reached and he grabbed it, and I hugged him and he hugged me,” Davis said. “And he said, ‘thank you for your courage.’”

        Religious freedom only exists to enforce religion and deny other freedoms.

    • Venia Silente@lemm.eeEnglish
      10·
      4 months ago

      Only if good people can get into the public offices in the first place.

      No cookie for guessing what will the secret interview question to become a marriage officer will be in those States.

    • oDDmON@lemmy.world
      8·
      4 months ago

      “Not if we gerrymander and marginalize them, until our great Leader returns and removes them all.” - (voters who wish to remain anonymous)

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      5·
      4 months ago

      Yes.

      Honestly I don’t see the problem. If someone wants a religious ceremony then they should agree to the rules of that religion. If they religion doesn’t want to do it that should be religious freedom.

      If they don’t want a religious ceremony then they can get a civil partnership or whatever which is legally the same without the religious marriage. Or go to another religion.

      Religion is stupid in my opinion and the more ridiculous it is allowed to be (excluding forcing children or people outside of the religion to do things) then I think fucking go for it, it will allow people to see the ridiculousness and turn people off.

    • InquisitiveApathy@lemm.eeEnglish
      4·
      4 months ago

      County clerks are an elected position in TN. If someone were to refuse to sanctify Christian unions then they would be out of a job the next election cycle or more likely removed from office.