• admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    In Switzerland, you cannot build any kind of major logistics facility without rail access.

    In the US, local rail connection isn’t even CONSIDERED when specifying logistics facilities. Even when they are being SHOWERED with tax and infrastructure subsidies to build economically-destructive machines.

    The only developed nation to have mostly privately-owned rail and right-of-way. It makes sense when you remember easily half of the country actively wants all cities to fail and collapse.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tbf, the major freight carriers in the US blow ass to try and do business with. They’re almost all being run like vulture capital operations, not trying to grow and flat-out ignoring cost centers.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        A big part of that, in my opinion, is because they own the track and right-of-way. It creates a VERY robust natural monopoly in a field that is already predisposed to natural monopoly.

        In other countries, even deregulated ones, the state still owns the track and right of way. It an operator isn’t doing a job, a competing operator can be given a license or pay the fee and use the track and just blow them up. The state can be responsible for maintenance of the infrastructure and safety features either directly, through a PPP, or by requiring the work be done by the licensed operators as part of their fee structure. But with essentially private ROW and track, you lose almost all power.

        Shout out to the fuckwits in Cincinnati selling off their incredibly valuable resource for pennies on the dollar.