• @xor
    link
    English
    903 months ago

    after looking into it:
    it’s not and it never was.
    a) it’s open source, so nobody’s putting that shit in there without getting caught
    b) it had an opt-in error reporting feature that would send data back… that was the entire thing…

    • @drislands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      233 months ago

      What? You must be joking. Really? The entire thing was about opt-in error reporting?

      … seriously, that can’t be it, can it?

      • Eager Eagle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not really that simple, it was an apparent change to the privacy policy that vaguely anticipated collection of arbitrary user data, which shook the confidence of the open source community on the project. The fact this happened right after audacity was sold was the cherry on top.

        https://github.com/audacity/audacity/issues/1213

        Changes were eventually reverted or revised.

        • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Were they reverted? I’ll have to check later, but an official statement from Muse Group stated they provided the data they collected to third parties so idk. If the telemetry is still there then I’m not downloading it, Open Source projects generally don’t need telemetry to begin with.

      • @xor
        link
        English
        113 months ago

        yep… really just that…

        i’ve used it forever with a very restrictive firewall and i’ve never seen it do anything unexpected… or any phoning home at all…

      • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -53 months ago

        in 2021 Audacity was acquired by a company called MuseGroup who added unnecessary telemetry and they admit that they do provide the data the collect to third parties. It’s spyware as far as I’m concerned.

          • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -13 months ago

            If it was truly opt in, then why did the community feel the need to create forks removing the telemetry? Plus, a lot of FOSS don’t need telemetry to start with. They get tons of voluntary high quality feedback without automated collection.

    • @books@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      Point a has always me me wonder, is that accurate? Are there actually people going through the code to make sure open source isn’t malicious? I can barely read my coworkers code… Let alone a strangers.

      • @xor
        link
        English
        53 months ago

        people are definitely going through the code on a project as popular as audacity…
        less well known stuff is much less scrutinized, of course

      • @aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Its way less work than going through the code to check for telemetry unless it is an intentionally hidden attack- just use Wireshark and check if there is network traffic other than checking for an update on program start.

    • @doctorcrimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -63 months ago

      That’s not entirely true, Audacity was acquired by a company called MuseGroup who added unnecessary telemetry and they admit that they do provide the data the collect to third parties. It’s spyware as far as I’m concerned.

      • @xor
        link
        English
        43 months ago

        i don’t believe you