Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoFleshy Podsslrpnk.netimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1269arrow-down115
arrow-up1254arrow-down1imageFleshy Podsslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squarehenfredemarslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up47arrow-down2·1 year agoMaybe I’m getting old but what does the “no one” header actually add to the meme? Doesn’t it work just fine without it?
minus-squareskooks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoAlso no one is saying nothing so I assume someone is saying something about these nutsacks
minus-squareTrousersMcPants@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·1 year agoI’ve always hated this format
minus-squareKarcinogen@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoIt’s a vestigial structure from when the meme format was first introduced. It was meant to show doing something despite no one requesting it. It could work without it, but then it’s considered a different meme format.
minus-squareBruceTwarzen@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·1 year agoYou don’t get it, it’s reddit funny
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoWhich is the same as ‘lemmy funny.’ Let’s not kid ourselves.
Maybe I’m getting old but what does the “no one” header actually add to the meme? Doesn’t it work just fine without it?
Also no one is saying nothing so I assume someone is saying something about these nutsacks
I’ve always hated this format
It’s a vestigial structure from when the meme format was first introduced. It was meant to show doing something despite no one requesting it. It could work without it, but then it’s considered a different meme format.
Would that be bad?
It introduces the mood.
You don’t get it, it’s reddit funny
Which is the same as ‘lemmy funny.’
Let’s not kid ourselves.