• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      If I see someone shoplifting necessities, no I didn’t. If I see someone shoplifting stupid luxury items, maybe I did, maybe I didn’t. Depends on the situation. If it’s a dumbass white kid who thinks they’re being funny, I sure as fuck did.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        White people can be poor, or motivated by any other force motivating any other ethnicity thief.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        And then low cost grocery stores close and neighbors starve. How about you help them pay for it since you are there? Is a little personal ownership over the things you see too much for you?

        • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          How about the government does better to ensure that it’s people don’t starve? Or maybe companies should pay their employees more instead of funnelling money to people who are already more than set for life?

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            We’re talking about you and your actions. Additionally, you are making the problem worse.

    • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      And if you see someone shoplift food/formula then no, the absolute fuck you didn’t.

      • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        A reminder not to rat on people failing to make ends meet, when the only damage they cause is a slightly lower profit for a corporation whose CEO lives the private jet lifestyle.

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          While that might be the only direct result, you’re also assuming that A) it’s only taking place in major chain stores and B) that the effects won’t include price hikes for everyone to compensate for that slight dip in profits.

          In reality, corporations have showed us they’re never going to just “take the L”. If something negatively impacts their bottom line, they’ll make up for it by forcing that financial burden onto their customers.

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Shrink” is just another way to spell “your boss is part of the system that bleeds you dry”.

          • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            If you would take the boot out of your mouth for literally one second, you would know that shrink is decreasing in almost all available metrics in the entire retail industry.

            Facts don’t care about your feelings, corpo dog.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Lol I was responding to a specific comment. Take a deep breath, baby boy.