If 100 homeless people were given $750 per month for a year, no questions asked, what would they spend it on?

That question was at the core of a controlled study conducted by a San Francisco-based nonprofit and the USC Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work.

The results were so promising that the researchers decided to publish results after only six months. The answer: food, 36.6%; housing, 19.5%; transportation, 12.7%; clothing, 11.5%; and healthcare, 6.2%, leaving only 13.6% uncategorized.

Those who got the stipend were less likely to be unsheltered after six months and able to meet more of their basic needs than a control group that got no money, and half as likely as the control group to have an episode of being unsheltered.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20231221131158/https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-12-19/750-a-month-no-questions-asked-improved-the-lives-of-homeless-people

  • corbin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    we could probably cut back on one of our 14 aircraft carriers

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Right. So without resorting to fantasy, what’s a realistic suggestion.

      • corbin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you want a serious answer, there are a lot of options. Closing tax loopholes for corporations, higher taxes for the wealthy, a freeze on additional military spending, stop outsourcing so much to contracted companies that blow through money for nothing (e.g. the reason why most people think government services are bad), etc. Those could all allow UBI to exist without raising taxes on the lower and middle class.

        • Pratai@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Again, I said- without resorting to fantasy. None of those things are even remotely possible.

          • corbin
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Okay? It sounds like you just don’t want an answer. Many of those changes are actually very possible if more young people start voting in elections instead of just being apathetic or having that defeatist/“realist” attitude. If you think nothing can get better ever then yeah, every solution is “fantasy.”

            • Pratai@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              They’re possible, but not remotely probable. And I’d love an answer. Just one that has a remote chance of actually happening. My head isn’t in the clouds banking on wishful thinking. I’m down here on the ground, trying to keep my expectations based on reality.

              I realize this is an unpopular opinion, but as the saying goes:

              A pessimist is a well-informed optimist.