like I went to taco bell and they didn’t even have napkins out. they had the other stuff just no napkins, I assume because some fucking ghoul noticed people liked taking them for their cars so now we just don’t get napkins! so they can save $100 per quarter rather than provide the barest minimum quality of life features.

  • ChouxFleur
    link
    fedilink
    57 months ago

    How does the law require them to be greedy?

    I just assumed that it was shareholders.

    • @Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      87 months ago

      Maybe not an exact law to be greedy but aren’t they legally responsible for acting in the interest of the shareholders not the consumer

    • @SPRUNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      Not technically a “law”…

      “The shareholder wealth maximization doctrine requires public corporations to pursue a single purpose to the exclusion of all others: increase the wealth of shareholders by increasing the value of their shares. However, a company should be committed to enhance shareholder value and comply with all regulations and laws that govern shareholder’s rights.”

      The" however… " part is largely ignored, except for when it benefits shareholders.

      • @TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        The “however” part you quoted explicitly mentions following the rights of shareholders. From what you described, there’s literally nothing else in the doctrine to ignore.

        • @SPRUNT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Yeah, your right. I guess I got to the part where it said “comply with regulations and laws” and laughed through the rest.