I was thinking about this in regards to all the “defederation” posts.

Let’s say you spin up a server and over night it gets super popular and grows enormous. Now your yearly expenses shoot up and you’re forced to either look for a new host or shut down.

Now what if instead, you could get a few other people to spin up more small instances and distribute parts of your biggest communities to them, however the users don’t notice because The communities are looking across instances instead of within their home instance?

That’s the idea at least. This would allow for many things but most importantly, it would make things a bit more manageable. Thoughts?

  • xavier666@lemm.ee
    4·
    1 year ago

    You are talking about horizontal scaling. It’s something which is non-trivial and would need the core of the app to be written in a very different way. Think of the challenges

    • Your sub-instance and your friend’s sub-instance which serves a common community can be geographically far apart
    • They need to be synced
    • Internal function calls which were once local now need to travel across the network
    • Depending upon the heterogeneity of the hardware, there can be a large jitter (bad for UX)

    The admin of my instance lemm.ee has tried to make horizontal scaling by decoupling some lemmy functions but pure horizontal scaling is really hard (glusterfs/spark).

    • ComradeKhoumrag
      1·
      1 year ago

      Would it be possible to have the dns of the instance technically be a load balancer and just point to different instances of the same docker container, but keep the database as a single shared entity?

      Edit: oh OP is talking about doing this on a sublemmy level instead of a site wide level. Would my idea work for the entire instance?

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        2·
        1 year ago

        dns of the instance technically be a load balancer and just point to different instances of the same docker container What you actually mean is the lemmy docker be loadbalanced. The DNS will only point to the loadbalancer.

        This is still somewhat doable and easier than what OP is asking for but I’m unsure whether lemmy can handle the synchronization issues. My instance manager (lemm.ee) has kind of distributed his architecture by decoupling core components of lemmy. Example

        • DB on one server
        • Loadbalancer on another server
        • Main lemmy instance on one server