• Scooter411@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is their “gotcha” move - if they don’t comment, it’s unsubstantiated hearsay. If they do comment it’s because it’s wrong.

    • NoTime@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just a gotcha to them. If I read an article from The Verge and Reddit hasn’t commented on it, I’m not even going to remember that quote, let alone make that connection that the article must be unsubstantiated hearsay.

      It must make them feel better saying it though.

      • Givesomefucks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even if they do, every article about Twitter comes with:

        Twitter responded to inquiries with the poop emoji, as they do every time.

        This is worse, because reddit is saying if anything was wrong, they would have responded. So it looks like reddit just agrees with anything that doesn’t get a response.

        • Boz (he/him)@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Logically, yes, but in the context of journalism, it’s actually doing a company a favor to give them a chance to comment before the article is published. If a company wants to say “no comment,” or be rude, that’s a choice they can make, but a poop emoji is refusing to comment and being rude.

          Imagine you’re writing an article about Twitter’s policies, and you know all your sources are angry, so you think you should try to get Twitter’s side. Maybe your sources are distorting the facts. So you send a polite email to Twitter, because you are a professional, and regardless of your own feelings, you want to present the facts. Twitter auto-replies with a poop emoji. No matter how you look at it, that’s inappropriate.

          And at this point, I don’t think anyone is asking Twitter about the facts, politely or otherwise, lol. I’m not sure if a publication would even print a correction from Twitter, if they bothered to submit one. If you tell the press to screw off and not ask you for facts, you will find it very difficult to get them to publish anything you say ever again, even if you want them to. Reddit isn’t there yet, but that’s the kind of fire they’re playing with.

      • Scooter411@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. It’s a horrible way to deal with the media and falls apart with even a little bit of scrutiny, but I never said it was a good strategy.