• viq
    link
    fedilink
    109 months ago

    @cassetti
    That’s risky, because the way you say it, I can check how you voted on things, and come have a serious discussion about your choices.
    Much more interesting are technologies that allow to prove something, without divulging the details.

    … Though again, those don’t require blockchain
    @alyaza @Poggervania @ComradeKhoumrag @GunnarRunnar

    • cassetti
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      Everyone has a unique identifier. If you don’t share that with anyone, how would they know who’s vote it is? Couldn’t the number be randomized and a new UUID provided on a routine basis?

      Every American has a Social Security number, but it’s not exactly like we’re told to broadcast it to the world… I don’t see why something like that couldn’t be implemented here using technology.

      My point is the general ledger technology of the blockchain which would be beneficial here.

      But of course this is all a pipe dream. America is damn near a Kleptocracy and both political parties have written laws to prevent a third political party from ever arising.

      • viq
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        @cassetti @alyaza @Poggervania @ComradeKhoumrag @GunnarRunnar if you use a unique identifier more than **once**, there’s possibility to correlate information and tie to a person. Even once you could use timestamps and other information to tie it to a person.

        And, in relation to government, there isn’t much benefit to using blockchain that couldn’t be solved using other technologies.