• The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe in the US. In Germany this defintly isn’t the rule. Many people own their own flats and a lot of people own 2-4 flats to rent them out as an extra income.

      • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Where did I say “everyone”?

        But it is defintly not a given that an apartment has to be the tool of a slum lord, the way they portrayed it to discredit the idea that appatments are a more sustainable way of living…

        Apartments can be owned by the people who live in it and this is quite common in many countries.

        • akulium@feddit.de
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          If one person rents out 4 appartments, that means that at least 4 others do not own their home. It’s the same with houses of course.

          Germany is just a particularly bad example unfortunately. Low ownership is a problem because it increases wealth inequality, which is also worse in Germany than many other nations.

          • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Low ownership is a problem because it increases wealth inequality

            True, but even here their statement that “all of those apartments are owned by one person” is far from a given. Especially with new developments this is rarely the case, even here.