For those who have pre-ordered it is already here, the rest have to wait a little longer. Starfield is finally here! Have you bought it, why or why not? If you’ve already played it, what do you think of it? We are very curious!

Discuss all things Starfield below!

    • Zron@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2710·
      10 months ago

      Calling Creation 2 a “new engine” is a little too generous.

      It’s an upgrade of their previous engine, which was an upgrade to gamebryo.

      Taking a Model T, and dropping the engine into a Porsche doesn’t mean you have a Porsche.

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.eeEnglish
        72·
        10 months ago

        valves new games are still running off code from gold source

        ‘engine old’ means extremely little and i wish people would stop parroting it

    • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      10 months ago

      Bethesda really needs to tweak their subsurface scattering for the skin and eyeballs (maybe have a separate render method of eye scatter)

    • redcalcium@lemmy.instituteEnglish
      68·
      10 months ago

      New engine? Do you mean the “Creation Engine 2”, which is still gamebryo at its core? I’m not complaining though because the engine is very mod friendly, it’s just realism is not its strong suit.

      • radix@lemmy.worldEnglish
        201·
        10 months ago

        RDR2 was built on RAGE, an engine originally used for a table tennis game. Things get upgraded and evolve.

        • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
          53·
          10 months ago

          It’s interesting how little evolving and upgrading Bethesda does with their stuff. You can’t say that RDR2 and that table tennis game feels the same, but Oblivion and Fallout 4 feel very similar.

          It’s a Bethesda problem, because other Gamebryo games don’t feel the same. Even CAVE did a better job with it.