Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most “artists” because most “art” is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

    This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you’re not qualified to have opinions on art in general.

    “AI” (in this context meaning generative algorithms, because there is no intelligence) can no more “make art” than it can think, or care.

    • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      In computer science Artificial Intelligence refers to any system designed to perform tasks that would typically require human intelligence. That includes everything from playing chess to recognizing patterns, translating languages, or generating text.

      The first ever AI system was Logic Theorist written by Allen Newell in 1956.

      Trying to redefine terms is not helpful. GenAI is AI. It’s not misuse of the term.

    • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you’re not qualified to have opinions on art in general.

      “At this point, the only thing that makes money is garbage. It’s just fascinating. It makes a fortune, and that’s the bottom line,”

      "writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

      -Charlie Kaufman

      https://deadline.com/2023/08/charlie-kaufman-ai-wga-strike-hollywood-sarajevo-1235498089/

      spoiler

      You’re probably one of the people that enjoys cookie-cutter art which is why you get defensive when someone says AI can make it.

      • tortina_original@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Not sure at what point will you realize that what you quoted/said has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.

        Probably never.

        • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most “artists” because most “art” is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

          "writers have been trained to eat and make the garbage too. As long as they are in that arena making that shit, then you might as well have AI do it,”

          Learn to read.

          • atomicorange@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Could you define what you mean when you say the word “art”? I think this may be a semantic disagreement. I think the people you’re arguing with are using a definition similar to “human creative expression” while you seem to mean something different.

            • alonsohmtz@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Nah, they’re just upset that I criticized their non-existent standards so they pretend that what I’m saying doesn’t make sense.

              I see it all the time.

              • atomicorange@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                If you see it all the time, respectfully, you might be the problem. This isn’t effective communication.