This is how all artists behave… Very protective of there works and f*** whatever they borrowed in making it…
think Minecraft modders they can mod Minecraft but oh the drama if you mod their mod… Maybe there is just a line the big frnchise is no longer protected… But this is not how people debate this issue.
Do y’all think Cy&H’s contribution to the arts is giving their stick figures colored shirts? Because this does not resemble that in any other way. The composition is not how Cy&H does framing, closeups, or group shots. The faces don’t match any of Cy&H’s several distinct artists in terms of shape or position. The body shape is closer to Buttersafe’s stick figures, or at a stretch, The Oatmeal.
When your whole thing is that everyone’s hand-made artwork is distinct in a way that AI never ever could be, That’s deeply undercut by treating every kind of stick figure like it’s ripping someone off.
The point was not that it is specifically c&h. The point is that it’s environmentally unfriendly, rapist-ceo mindset, job stealing, RAM price inflating, bubble making AI slop.
And since we want to go there, OP could’ve drawn this themselves. On paper with pencil, on canvas with paint, digitally with krita. Made their own stick figures.
They did not. They asked Copilot to make it and wasted at least 16oz of fresh water if not more in the process
Moving goalposts is bad faith. Don’t scoff that something is a ripoff and then also scoff ‘that’s not the point.’ Then why did you write it?
Reaching for other generic complaints is not an excuse. Especially when some are just wrong - does your PC consume two bottles of water, to spin the fans for one minute? Because that’s about the impact of running these models. Training is energy-intensive, but once it’s done, it’s done.
The patterns of denialism are dangerous no matter what they’re for or against. What you’re doing right now is not sincere argument. You’re shuffling cards. In the face of specific criticism for the topic you chose, you have literally nothing to say, yet the conclusion doubles down. This is the behavior I’ve dealt with from creationists and worse, and it is alarmingly common in people shitting on generative AI. There’s no shortage of actual shit to talk, on this subject - but you will never separate actual damning criticism from empty ingroup signalling, if any questions see you circle the wagons and open fire.
I didnt move shit buddy. I stated an opinion the first time, and a longer opinion the second time. Go back to Reddit if you want to spread literal misinformation and propaganda.
OP has posted AI before. look at their profile, they watermarked this cyanide and happiness ripoff too.
I don’t get the point of watermarking AI images. Like, you didn’t even make it, why would you be so worried about it being stolen?
AI “artists” are weirdly very protective of their “”“craft”“”
And the fact that watermark is so easy to remove
Can you use AI to do it?
AI users be like:
This is how all artists behave… Very protective of there works and f*** whatever they borrowed in making it…
think Minecraft modders they can mod Minecraft but oh the drama if you mod their mod… Maybe there is just a line the big frnchise is no longer protected… But this is not how people debate this issue.
This is how many commercial artists behave.
FTFY
What exactly leads you to feeling justified in posting such a sweeping generalizing comment?
Not to mention that it was generated based on stolen content. The irony.
Do y’all think Cy&H’s contribution to the arts is giving their stick figures colored shirts? Because this does not resemble that in any other way. The composition is not how Cy&H does framing, closeups, or group shots. The faces don’t match any of Cy&H’s several distinct artists in terms of shape or position. The body shape is closer to Buttersafe’s stick figures, or at a stretch, The Oatmeal.
When your whole thing is that everyone’s hand-made artwork is distinct in a way that AI never ever could be, That’s deeply undercut by treating every kind of stick figure like it’s ripping someone off.
The point was not that it is specifically c&h. The point is that it’s environmentally unfriendly, rapist-ceo mindset, job stealing, RAM price inflating, bubble making AI slop.
And since we want to go there, OP could’ve drawn this themselves. On paper with pencil, on canvas with paint, digitally with krita. Made their own stick figures.
They did not. They asked Copilot to make it and wasted at least 16oz of fresh water if not more in the process
Moving goalposts is bad faith. Don’t scoff that something is a ripoff and then also scoff ‘that’s not the point.’ Then why did you write it?
Reaching for other generic complaints is not an excuse. Especially when some are just wrong - does your PC consume two bottles of water, to spin the fans for one minute? Because that’s about the impact of running these models. Training is energy-intensive, but once it’s done, it’s done.
The patterns of denialism are dangerous no matter what they’re for or against. What you’re doing right now is not sincere argument. You’re shuffling cards. In the face of specific criticism for the topic you chose, you have literally nothing to say, yet the conclusion doubles down. This is the behavior I’ve dealt with from creationists and worse, and it is alarmingly common in people shitting on generative AI. There’s no shortage of actual shit to talk, on this subject - but you will never separate actual damning criticism from empty ingroup signalling, if any questions see you circle the wagons and open fire.
I didnt move shit buddy. I stated an opinion the first time, and a longer opinion the second time. Go back to Reddit if you want to spread literal misinformation and propaganda.
Shuffle shuffle.