qaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoWeb3 is here and it's gloriouslemmy.worldimagemessage-square184fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down146
arrow-up11.54Karrow-down1imageWeb3 is here and it's gloriouslemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square184fedilink
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoI suggest forking Web3 into at least three competing things
minus-squareUbermeisters@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoas long as they all compete to be the standard, and aren’t going to communicate with each other well, I’m in!
minus-squareandrew@lemmy.stuart.funlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoCan Web3-D be unnecessary VR integration?
minus-squaremustardman@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoJust do what USB does and call it “Web 3 v2”
minus-squarekimpilledlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoNote that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.
Time for Web4
I suggest forking Web3 into at least three competing things
as long as they all compete to be the standard, and aren’t going to communicate with each other well, I’m in!
Can Web3-D be unnecessary VR integration?
deleted by creator
Just do what USB does and call it “Web 3 v2”
Web 3 v2 final (1)
Note that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.
Web69