qaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoWeb3 is here and it's gloriouslemmy.worldimagemessage-square184fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down146
arrow-up11.54Karrow-down1imageWeb3 is here and it's gloriouslemmy.worldqaz@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square184fedilink
minus-squareRaivoKulli@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 years agoI suggest forking Web3 into at least three competing things
minus-squareUbermeisters@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoas long as they all compete to be the standard, and aren’t going to communicate with each other well, I’m in!
minus-squareandrew@lemmy.stuart.funlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoCan Web3-D be unnecessary VR integration?
minus-squaremustardman@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 years agoJust do what USB does and call it “Web 3 v2”
minus-squarekimpilledlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoNote that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.
Time for Web4
I suggest forking Web3 into at least three competing things
as long as they all compete to be the standard, and aren’t going to communicate with each other well, I’m in!
Can Web3-D be unnecessary VR integration?
deleted by creator
Just do what USB does and call it “Web 3 v2”
Web 3 v2 final (1)
Note that not all Web 3 v2 final (1) features are required to be labeled Web 3 v2 final (1). Please consult vendor documentation to determine which features are supported on their device.
Web69