Quilotoa@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Australian PM proposes tougher national gun laws after mass shooting in Sydneywww.cbc.caexternal-linkmessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down12cross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.online
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkAustralian PM proposes tougher national gun laws after mass shooting in Sydneywww.cbc.caQuilotoa@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square19linkfedilinkcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.online
minus-squareAsmodeus_KranglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down25·2 个月前Nah, you can deepthroat boot by yourself. I’m sure these new laws will work as well as the last ones.
minus-squareSaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·2 个月前 I’m sure these new laws will work as well as the last ones. Australia gun deaths: 0.90 per 100,000 people US Gun deaths: 13.7 per 100,000 people. Canada Gun deaths: 0.78 per 100,000 people.
minus-squareLushed_Lungfish@lemmy.cacakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前Wow, I had no idea we had fewer per capita gun deaths than Australia.
minus-squareAsmodeus_KranglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down22·2 个月前As if gun deaths are the only ones that matter? Now do arsons, stabbings, and bludgeonings. I hear Australia has a real problem with arson.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·edit-22 个月前https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate Still significantly lower. But also that’s a weak dodge from your initial failed argument.
minus-squareAsmodeus_KranglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down11·2 个月前So? Violent crime in the US is continually dropping. Why should we predicate our rights based on the lowest common denominator? Are you only as good as the shittiest among you?
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 个月前Are you suggesting that gun control laws cause arson? Like, I want to rob some guy but I don’t have a gun, guess I’ll set him on fire?
minus-squareGoldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·2 个月前Tbh i have no idea about gun control laws in Australia. Haha
minus-squaretheyoyomaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down13·2 个月前They are highly effective at ensuring that people who do not break laws cannot get guns easily.
minus-squarecammoblammo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 个月前They also make it harder for people who do break laws to get guns easily.
minus-squaretheyoyomaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前Cool, so only criminals who are slightly dedicated to breaking the law get guns and no one else. Got it.
Nah, you can deepthroat boot by yourself. I’m sure these new laws will work as well as the last ones.
Australia gun deaths: 0.90 per 100,000 people
US Gun deaths: 13.7 per 100,000 people.
Canada Gun deaths: 0.78 per 100,000 people.
Wow, I had no idea we had fewer per capita gun deaths than Australia.
As if gun deaths are the only ones that matter? Now do arsons, stabbings, and bludgeonings. I hear Australia has a real problem with arson.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
Still significantly lower. But also that’s a weak dodge from your initial failed argument.
So? Violent crime in the US is continually dropping. Why should we predicate our rights based on the lowest common denominator? Are you only as good as the shittiest among you?
Are you suggesting that gun control laws cause arson? Like, I want to rob some guy but I don’t have a gun, guess I’ll set him on fire?
Removed by mod
Tbh i have no idea about gun control laws in Australia. Haha
They are highly effective at ensuring that people who do not break laws cannot get guns easily.
They also make it harder for people who do break laws to get guns easily.
Cool, so only criminals who are slightly dedicated to breaking the law get guns and no one else. Got it.
Obviously.