iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 months agoIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...imagemessage-square142linkfedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down183
arrow-up1564arrow-down1imageIt was best as a silly toy language in the 1990's...iamdisappoint@reddthat.com to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 months agomessage-square142linkfedilink
minus-squarehperrin@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoYes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.
https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
Yes, if you do silly things with JS, you generally get silly results instead of TypeErrors. I wouldn’t say that makes the language bad. It makes the language resilient to bad programming, which you’d generally want in the case of web pages.