• HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why is that? They can be useful - especially if you are including links in something like a print publication

    • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      It doesnt matter how short a link is on paper, I am probably not going to take the time to type the whole damn thing on a shitty phone keyboard.

      QR codes aren’t great either, but I would prefer those in a print publication than a shortened URL. Just give me the full URL in a QR code thanks.

    • hypelightfly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago
      1. They are insecure with no way to know what the real URL is.
      2. If you don’t control it you can’t guarantee the link will always work (bad for print).
      3. Register a shorter domain or novelty domain for your print publication.

      How are they useful?

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because then other people control the link. Imagine writing a long print article about a community coming together to care for an elderly holocaust survivor that includes a link for more info. And then Musk (or whomever has the control over the link shortener you use) comes along and decides the link in your article should point at a holocaust denialism site instead. You can’t change the link that’s now printed on paper, but they can change what it points at.

      • wagoner
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Or the shortened web site shuts down and all that history is lost. Happened to, I believe, the Guardian newspapers shortening service.