the headline claims “initial inquiry”….
which, being bound by journalistic integrity, they must report what Israel says without editorializing.
In this article and a subsequent one they state that it was their cameraman and he was murdered, and Israel lied.
But, when they asked Isreal for a statement (initial inquiry), Isreal said it was a Hamas Camera….
One really important takeaway: Israel didn’t claim they thought he had a weapon, they acknowledged that they knew it was a camera.
This is extremely disrespectful to their employee who is now dead.
deleted by creator
the headline claims “initial inquiry”….
which, being bound by journalistic integrity, they must report what Israel says without editorializing.
In this article and a subsequent one they state that it was their cameraman and he was murdered, and Israel lied.
But, when they asked Isreal for a statement (initial inquiry), Isreal said it was a Hamas Camera….
One really important takeaway: Israel didn’t claim they thought he had a weapon, they acknowledged that they knew it was a camera.