Persona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 months agoRuleimagemessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1405arrow-down115
arrow-up1390arrow-down1imageRulePersona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square56linkfedilink
minus-squareTurret3857linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·7 months agoWhy pay for what’s already free? Kreate for Android Yattee for iOS
minus-squarefroufox@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoI don’t have a phone except working one which doesn’t allow installation of any APKs, plus my wife also uses YT Music and YouTube family subscription
minus-squareFlames5123@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·7 months agoBecause I use the YouTube app on Apple TV. It doesn’t have all the fancy stuff. Plus I want to kinda support the dozens of creators I watch without spending $120/month since they’d all be Patreon/Twitch.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoPaying the streaming company does not support the artist.
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoYouTube has a revenue split with it’s creators? Ads (and therefore Premium) are often a good part of a creator’s income? It may not support them by a lot, but it supports them infinitely more than blocking all ads.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoMost of the ones i like make their money on patreon. Oh, lol, .world
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI suppose that is so; but if you’d ask them whether they’d also rather have the ad revenue, I would assume most of them would say yes. Ah, yes. Make fun of me for signing up with some domain when I was still clueless about Lemmy. Thanks. Really appreciate the generalisation.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months ago most would say yes I’d expect most resent the shitty split make fun of me Gladly! really appreciate No problem!
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months ago I’d expect most resent the shitty split That does not prove your point of them not getting any support, though.
minus-squareouthouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoIm not going to keep arguing with someone from .world.
minus-squareSuperSpruce@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoA single month of patreon is gonna give them more money than watching all their videos with ads, you can just rotate
Why pay for what’s already free?
Kreate for Android
Yattee for iOS
I don’t have a phone except working one which doesn’t allow installation of any APKs, plus my wife also uses YT Music and YouTube family subscription
Because I use the YouTube app on Apple TV. It doesn’t have all the fancy stuff. Plus I want to kinda support the dozens of creators I watch without spending $120/month since they’d all be Patreon/Twitch.
Paying the streaming company does not support the artist.
YouTube has a revenue split with it’s creators? Ads (and therefore Premium) are often a good part of a creator’s income?
It may not support them by a lot, but it supports them infinitely more than blocking all ads.
Most of the ones i like make their money on patreon.
Oh, lol, .world
I suppose that is so; but if you’d ask them whether they’d also rather have the ad revenue, I would assume most of them would say yes.
Ah, yes. Make fun of me for signing up with some domain when I was still clueless about Lemmy. Thanks. Really appreciate the generalisation.
I’d expect most resent the shitty split
Gladly!
No problem!
That does not prove your point of them not getting any support, though.
Im not going to keep arguing with someone from .world.
A single month of patreon is gonna give them more money than watching all their videos with ads, you can just rotate